The Literature Review in Grounded Theory A response to McCallin

Main Article Content

Tom Andrews

Abstract

The paper by McCallin (2003) is a useful contribution to the debate surrounding the role of the literature in Grounded Theory (GT). For the purpose of this paper and with reference to McCallin (2003) the issue will be discussed in relation to the purpose of a review within GT. It will be argued that the misunderstanding about the function of the literature within a GT study arises partly as a result of the confusion caused by the continual rewriting of the method. Further it will be argued that a preliminary reading of the literature is entirely consistent with the principals of GT. Finally some practical suggestions will be made as to how the issue could be dealt with in a way that is unproblematic for GT.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Andrews, T. (2006). The Literature Review in Grounded Theory: A response to McCallin. Grounded Theory Review, 5(02/03), 29–34. Retrieved from https://groundedtheoryreview.org/index.php/gtr/article/view/117
Section
Articles

References

Charmaz, K. (2000). Grounded theory objectivist and constructivist method. In: Denzin, N. and Lincoln, Y. (EDS.), Handbook of Qualitative Research. Sage Publications, Thousand Oakes, pp. 509535.

Glaser, B. (1978). Theoretical sensitivity: advances in the methodology of grounded theory. Sociology Press, Mill Valley, CA.

Glaser, B. (1998). Doing grounded theory: issues and discussions. Sociology Press, Mill Valley, CA.

Glaser, B. (2003). The grounded theory perspective 2 description's remodelling of grounded theory methodology. Sociology Press, Mill Valley, CA.

McCallin, A. (2003) Grappling with the literature in a grounded theory study. Contemporary Nurse 15, 6169.

Mills, J., Bonner, A., and Francis, K. (2006) Adopting a constructivist approach to grounded theory: implications for research design. International Journal of Nursing Practice 12, 813.

Polit, D. and Beck, C. (2006). Essentials of Nursing Research. Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, Philadelphia.