Classic Grounded Theory to Analyse Secondary Data: Reality and Reflections
Main Article Content
Abstract
This paper draws on the experiences of two researchers and discusses how they conducted a secondary data analysis using classic grounded theory. The aim of the prim ary study was to explore first-time parents’ postnatal educational needs. A subset of the data from the primary study (eight transcripts from interviews with fathers) was used for the secondary data analysis. The objectives of the secondary data analysis were to identify the challenges of using classic grounded theory with secondary data and to explore whether the re-analysis of primary data using a different methodology would yield a different outcome. Through the process of re-analysis a tentative theory emerged on ‘developing competency as a father’. Challenges encountered during this re-analysis included the sm all dataset, the pre-framed data, and limited ability for theoretical sampling. This re-analysis proved to be a very useful learning tool for author 1( LA), who was a novice with classic grounded theory.
Downloads
Article Details
The Grounded Theory Review is an open access journal, which means that all content is freely available without charge to the user or his/her institution. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles in this journal without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author. This is in accordance with the international Budapest Open Access Initiative (BOAI) definition of open access.
References
Andrews, L. (2000) Learning to be a parent: "It's not until it happens". Unpublished Masters Dissertation, Dublin: Trinity College Dublin.
Annells, M. (1997a) Grounded theory method, part 1: within the five moments of qualitative research. Nursing Inquiry, 4(2), 120-129.
Annells, M. (1997b) Grounded theory method, part I I: options for users of the method. Nursing Inquiry, 4(3), 176-180.
Bishop, L. (2007) A reflective account of reusing qualitative data beyond primary/ secondary dualism. Retrieved from Sociological Research Online, 12(3)2,< http: / / www.socresonline.org.uk/ 12/ 3/ 2.htm l> doi: 10.5153/ sro.1553.
Brewer, E.W. (2006) Secondary data analysis. Retrieved from Encyclopaedia of measurement and statistics, Sage Publications. Retrieved 8/ 9/ 2009 http: / / sage-rereference.com / statistics/ Article_n398.htm l.
Cobban, S.J., Edgington, E.M., & Pimlott, J.F.L. (2008) An ethical perspective on research using shared data. Canadian Journal of Dental Hygiene, 42(5), 233- 238.
Cooney, A. (2010) Choosing between Glaser and Strauss: an example. Nurse Researcher, 17(4), 18-28.
Corti, L. (2008) Secondary Analysis. Retrieved from The Sage Encyclopaedia of Qualitative Research Methods, Sage Publications. Retrieved 6/ 9/ 2010. http: / / sage-ereference.com / research/ Article_n415.htm l.
Cutcliffe, J.R., & McKenna, H.P. (1999) Establishing the credibility of qualitative research findings: the plot thickens, Journal of Advanced Nursing, 30 (2), 374-380.
Fielding, N. (2004) Getting the most from archived qualitative data: epistemological, practical and professional obstacles. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 7 (1), 97- 104.
Gladstone, B.M., Volpe, T., & Boydell, K.M. (2007) Issues encountered in a qualitative secondary analysis of help seeking in the prodrome to psychosis. The Journal of Behavioural Health Sciences and Research, 34 (4) , 431- 442.
Glaser, B.G. (2005) The grounded theory perspective I I I: Theoretical coding, Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.
Glaser, B.G. (2003) The grounded theory perspective I I: Description's remodelling of grounded theory methodology, Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.
Glaser, B.G. (2001) The grounded theory perspective: Conceptualization contrasted with description, Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.
Glaser, B.G. (1998) Doing grounded theory: Issues and discussions, Mill Valley CA: Sociology Press.
Glaser, B.G. (1992) The basics of grounded theory analysis: Emergence vs. forcing, San Francisco: Sociology Press.
Glaser, B.G. (1978) Theoretical sensitivity advances in the methodology of grounded theory, Mill Valley CA: Sage.
Glaser, B.G., & Strauss, A.L. (1967) The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research, New York: Aldine De Gruyter.
Glaser, B.G. (1963) Retreading research materials: the use of secondary data analysis by the independent researcher. American Behavioural Science, 6(10), 11-14.
Heath, H., & Cowley, S. (2004) Developing a grounded theory approach: a comparison of Glaser and Strauss, International Journal of Nursing Studies, 41 (2), 141-150.
Heaton, J. (2004) Reworking qualitative data, London: Sage Publications Limited.
Heaton, J. (1998) Secondary analysis of qualitative data, Retrieved from Social Research Update, issue 22, Autumn 1998. Guildford: Department of Sociology, University of Surrey, Guildford. Retrieved from http: / / sru.soc.surrey.ac.uk/ SRU22.html
Hinds, P.S., Vogel, R.J., & Clarke-Steffen, L. (1997) The possibilities and pitfalls of doing a secondary analysis of a qualitative data set. Qualitative Health Research, 7 (3), 408-424.
Kelle, U. (2007) The development of categories: different approaches in grounded theory. In Bryant, A., & Charmaz, K. (Eds.).The sage handbook of grounded theory. (pp.191-213). London: Sage Publications Limited.
Mason, J. (2007) Re-using qualitative data: on the merits of an investigative epistemology. Retrieved from Sociological Research Online 12(3)3 < http: / / www.socresonline.org.uk/ 12/ 3/ 3.htm l> doi: 10.5153/ sro.1507.
McCallin, A.M. (2003) Designing a grounded theory study: some practicalities. Nursing in Critical Care, 8(5), 203- 208.
Moore, N. (2007) (Re) Using qualitative data? . Retrieved from Sociological Research Online 3, 12(3). http: / / www.socresonline.org.uk/ 12/ 3/ 1.htm l# fn1 , doi: 10.5153/ sro.1496.
Parry, O., & Mauthner, N. (2005) Back to basics: who re-uses qualitative data and why? Sociology, 39, 337-342.
Schreiber, R., Crooks, D., & Stern, P.N. (1997) Qualit ative m eta-analysis. In Morse, J. M. (Ed.), Completing a qualitative project, ( pp. 311-326). Sage: Thousand Oaks, CA.
Silva, E.R. (2007) What's [ yet] to be seen? Re-using qualitative data. Retrieved from Sociological Research Online, 12 (3) http: / / www.socresonline.org.uk/ 12/ 3/ 4.html, doi: 10.5153/ sro.1478.
Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998) Basics of qualitative research: techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory, 2nd edn. California: Thousand Oaks.
Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990) Basics of qualitative research: grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
Strauss, A. (1987) Qualitative analysis for social scientists, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Szabo, V., & Strang, V.R. (1997) Secondary analysis of qualitative data. Advances in Nursing Science, 20(2), 66-74.
Trochim , W. M.K. (2006) Unobtrusive measures, Retrieved from The research methods knowledge base, 2nd edn. Retrieved from http://www.socialresearchmethods.net/kb/unobtrus.php.
Van den Berg, H. (2005) Reanalyzing qualitative interviews from different angles: the risk of de-contextualization and other problems of sharing qualitative data. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 6(1). Retrieved from http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/499/1074.
Walker, D., & Myrick, F. (2006) Grounded theory: an explanation of process and procedure. Qualitative Health Research, 16(4), 547- 559.