Choosing a Methodological Path: Reflections on the Constructivist Turn
Main Article Content
Abstract
Researchers deciding to use grounded theory are faced with complex decisions regarding which method or version of grounded theory to use: Classic, Straussian, feminist, or constructivist grounded theory. Particularly for beginning PhD researchers, this can prove challenging given the complexities of the inherent philosophical debates and the ambiguous and conflicting use of grounded theory ‘versions’ within popular literature. The aim of this article is to demystify the differences between classic and constructivist grounded theory, presenting a critique of constructivist grounded theory that is rooted in the learning experiences of the first author as she grappled with differing perspectives during her own PhD research.
Downloads
Article Details
The Grounded Theory Review is an open access journal, which means that all content is freely available without charge to the user or his/her institution. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles in this journal without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author. This is in accordance with the international Budapest Open Access Initiative (BOAI) definition of open access.
References
Appleton, J.V. & King, L. (2002). Journeying from the philosophical contemplation of constructivism to the methodological pragmatics of health services research. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 40, 641-648.
Breckenridge, J. & Jones, D. (2009). Demystifying theoretical sampling in grounded theory research. The Grounded Theory Review, 8, 113-126.
Bryant, A. (2009). Grounded theory and pragmatism: The curious case of Anselm Struass. Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 10.
Bryant, A. & Charmaz, K. (2007). Grounded theory research: Methods and practices. In A. Bryant & K. Charmaz (Eds.), The Sage Handbook of Grounded Theory (pp.1-29). London: Sage Publications Limited.
Charmaz, K. (2003). Grounded theory: Obejectivist and constructivist methods. In N.K.Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Strategies of qualitative inquiry (2nd ed., pp. 249-291). London: Sage Publications Limited.
Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. London: Sage Publications Limited.
Cutcliffe, J.R. (2004). Adapt or adopt: Developing and transgressing the methodological boundaries of grounded theory. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 51, 421-428.
Crotty, M. (1998) The foundations of social research: Meaning and perspective in the research process. London: Sage Publications Limited.
Duncan, E. A. S. & Nicol, M. M. (2004). Subtle realism and occupational therapy: An alternative approach to knowledge generation and evaluation. British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 67, 453-456.
Glaser, B. G. (1978). Theoretical sensitivity: Advances in the methodology of grounded theory. Mill Valley, California: Sociology Press.
Glaser, B. G. (1992). Basics of grounded theory analysis. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.
Glaser, B. G. (1998). Doing grounded theory: Issues and discussions. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.
Glaser, B. G. (2001). The grounded theory perspective: Conceptualisation contrasted with description. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.
Glaser, B. G. (2002). Constructivist grounded theory? Forum : Qualitative Social Research, 3.
Glaser, B. G. (2003). The grounded theory perspective II: Description's remodelling of grounded theory methodology. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.
Glaser, B. G. (2004). Naturalist inquiry and grounded theory. Forum : Qualitative Social Research, 5.
Glaser, B. G. (2005). The grounded theory perspective III: Theoretical coding. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.
Glaser, B. G. (2011) Getting out of the data: Grounded theory conceptualisation. Mill Vallye, CA: Sociology Press.
Glaser, B. G. & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. New York, NY: Aldine de Gruyter.
Grix, J. (2002). Introducing students to the generic terminology of social research. Politics, 22, 175-186.
Holton, J. A. (2009). Qualitative tussles in undertaking a grounded theory study. The Grounded Theory Review, 8, 37-50.
Martin, V. B. (2006). The postmodern turn: Shall classic grounded theory take that detour? The Grounded Theory Review, 5, 119-128.
Strauss, A. L. & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Strauss, A. L. & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. (2nd ed.) Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.