Marshaling Resources: A Classic Grounded Theory Study of Online Learners
Main Article Content
Abstract
Classic grounded theory (CGT) was used to identify a main concern of online students in higher education. One of the main impediments to studying online is a sense of isolation and lack of access to support systems as students navigate through complex requirements of their online programs. Hypothetical probability statements illustrate the imbalance between heightened needs of virtual learners and perceived inadequate support provided by educational institutions. The core variable, marshaling resources, explains how peer supports sustain motivation toward successful program completion. Understanding the critical contribution virtual interpersonal networks make towards maximizing resources by group problem solving is a significant aspect of this theory.
Downloads
Article Details
The Grounded Theory Review is an open access journal, which means that all content is freely available without charge to the user or his/her institution. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles in this journal without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author. This is in accordance with the international Budapest Open Access Initiative (BOAI) definition of open access.
References
Allen, E., & Seaman, J. (2010). Class differences: Online education in the United States. Needham, MA: The Sloan Consortium. Retrieved from http://www.sloan-c.org/publications/survey/pdf/online_nation.pdf
Allen, E., & Seaman, J. (2013). Changing Course: Ten years of tracking online education in the United States. Retrieved from http http://www.onlinelearningsurvey.com/reports/changingcourse.pdf
Cull, S., Reed, D., & Kirk, K. (2012, March 22). Student motivation and engagement in online courses. Teaching Geoscience Online. Retrieved from http://serc.carleton.edu/NAGTWorkshops/online/motivation.html
Gatin, G. V. (2013). Keeping your distance. The Grounded Theory Review, 12(1), 9-25.
Gittings, B. (2010). The effect of student attributes and program characteristics on doctoral degree completion (Doctoral Dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses. (UMI. No. 3415203)
Glaser, B. G. (1965). The constant comparative method of qualitative analysis. Social Problems, 12(4), 436-445.
Glaser, B., & Strauss, A. (1965). Awareness of Dying. Chicago: Aldine Publishing.
Glaser, B. G. (1978). Theoretical sensitivity: Advances in the methodology of grounded theory. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.
Glaser, B. G. (1998). Doing grounded theory: Issues and discussions. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.
Glaser, B. G. (2001). The grounded theory perspective: Conceptualization contrasted with description. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.
Glaser, B. G. (2002). Conceptualization: On theory and theorizing using grounded theory. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 1(2), 1–31. doi:10.1.1.120.9345
Glaser, B. G. (2007). All is data. The Grounded Theory Review, 6(2), 1-22. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.
Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago, IL: Aldine Publishing Company.
Goleman, D. (1997). Emotional intelligence: Why it can matter more than IQ. New York, NY: Bantam.
Holton, J. (2007). Rehumanizing knowledge work through fluctuating support networks; A grounded theory. The Grounded Theory Review: An International Journal, 6(2), 23-46.
Kember, D., & Leung, D. Y. (2009). Development of a questionnaire for assessing students’ perceptions of the teaching and learning environment and its use in quality assurance. Learning Environments Research, 12(1), 15-29. doi:10.1007/s10984-008-9050-7
Kiliç-Çakmak, E.,Karatas, S., & Ocak, M. (2009). An analysis of factors affecting community college students’ expectations on e-learning. The Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 10(4)351-361.
Knowles, M. (1980). Modern practice of adult education: From pedagogy to andragogy (Revised ed.). Chicago, IL: Association Press.
Moore, M. G. (2007). The theory of transactional distance. In G. Moore (Ed.) Handbook of distance education (2nd ed., pp. 89-105). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Saba, F. (2011). The future of distance education: A research and development agenda. In M. Shaughnessy & S. Fulgham (Eds.), Pedagogical models: The discipline of online (pp. 213-222). Hauppauge, NY: Nova Science Publication Inc.
Scott, H. (2007). The temporal integration of connected study into a structured life. The Grounded Theory Review: An International Journal, 6(2), 95-116.
Shea, P., & Bidjerano, T. (2009). Community of inquiry as a theoretical framework to foster “epistemic engagement” and “cognitive presence” in online education. Computers & Education, 52, 543–553.
Siemens, G. (2008, January). Learning and knowing in networks: Changing roles for educators and designers. Paper presented at University of Georgia IT Forum, Athens, Georgia. Retrieved from http://it.coe.uga.edu/itforum/Paper105/Siemens.pdf
Simmons, O. (2011). Why classic grounded theory? In V. Martin & A. Gynnild (Eds.), Grounded theory: The philosophy, method, and work of Barney Glaser (pp. 15-30). Boca Raton, FLA: Brown Walker Press.
Tinto, V. (2012). Completing college: Rethinking institutional action. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes (14th ed.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press (Original work published in 1931).