A Grounded Theory of Political Intelligentizing in Business Administration
Main Article Content
Abstract
This study focuses on the substantive area of business administration using the classic grounded theory method. Business administration is mostly driven by political games between top-level corporate managers. The main concern of the managers I met was that they wanted to be more politically successful. For them, success meant being able to change regularly the course of decisions and action within their firm. The study led to the emergence of a core variable called political intelligentizing. Political intelligentizing explains the recurrent main concern that these managers have to resolve, and it explains the competences managers have to combine to succeed regularly in organisational politics. They resolve their main problem through political intelligentizing which consists in acquiring, developing and combining six specific skills: time matching, rhetorical fitting, silence juggling, strategic forward-thinking, strategic interacting and relationing.
Downloads
Article Details
The Grounded Theory Review is an open-access journal, which means that all content is freely available without charge to the user or his/her institution. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles in this journal without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author. This is in accordance with the international Budapest Open Access Initiative (BOAI) definition of open access.
References
Adams, S. M., & Zanzi, A. (2006). Developing political intelligence for making feasible decisions. Journal Of Management Development, 25(4), 350-367. doi:10.1108/0262171061055828
Christiansen, O. (2006). Opportunizing: A classic grounded theory study on business and management. Grounded theory review, 6(1), 109-133. Retrieved from http://groundedtheoryreview.com
Christiansen, O. (2011). Rethinking “quality” by classic grounded theory. International Journal of Quality and Service Sciences, 3(2), 200-210. doi:10.1108/17566691111146096
Crozier, M. & Friedberg, E. (1977). L’acteur et le système. Paris: Edition du Seuil.
Farrell, D. & Petersen, J.C. (1982). Patterns of political behavior in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 7(3), 403-412. doi:10.5465/AMR.1982.4285337
Ferris, G.R., Anthony, W.P., Kolodinsky, R.W. & Gilmore, D.C. (2000). Political skill at work. Organizational Dynamics, 28(4), 25-37. doi:10.1016/S0090-2616(00)00007-3
French, J.R.P. & Raven, B.H. (1968). The bases of social power. In Cartwright, D. & Zander, A. (Eds.), Group Dynamics (pp. 259-69). Retrieved from http://www.communicationcache.com/uploads/1/0/8/8/10887248/the_bases_of_social_power_-_chapter_20.pdf
Glaser, B. G. (1978). Theoretical sensitivity. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.
Glaser, B. G. (2014). No preconceptions: The grounded theory dictum. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.
Glaser, B. G. & Christiansen, O. (2007). Opportunizing. In Glaser, B.G. & Holton, J. (Eds.), The grounded theory seminar reader (pp. 219-223). Retrieved from http://www.sociologypress.com/books/readers/GTSeminarReader.htm
Goleman, D. (1998). What makes a leader? Harvard business Review. 76(6), 93-102. Retrieved from https://hbr.org/2004/01/what-makes-a-leader/ar/1
Kotter, J.P. (1985). Power and influence: Beyond formal authority. New York, NY: Free Press.
Long, N. (1962). The Administrative Organization as a political system. In Mailick, S. & Van Ness, E.H. (Eds.), Concepts and Issues in Administrative Behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Pfeffer, J. (1992). Managing with power: Politics and influence in organizations. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.