Oscillating between Conservation and Investment: A Grounded Theory of Students’ Strategies for Optimizing Personal Resources
Main Article Content
Abstract
Students’ use of time and effort during their studies has been discussed exhaustively in mass media and educational research. In most cases, researchers try to give advice to teachers on how to get their students to become more active and engaged. The grounded theory presented in this article, however, challenges this approach by focusing on the students’ point of view. When interviewing students for this study, I soon realized that students only have a limited amount of time and effort at their disposal. Optimizing these personal resources emerged as their main concern. For the students, investing resources into one study activity always means having to reduce the amount of time and effort they can spend on other activities. They resolve their main concern by oscillating between conservation and investment strategies. Their decision regarding which type of strategy to use depends strongly on the students’ evaluation of their current situation.
Downloads
Article Details
The Grounded Theory Review is an open access journal, which means that all content is freely available without charge to the user or his/her institution. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles in this journal without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author. This is in accordance with the international Budapest Open Access Initiative (BOAI) definition of open access.
References
Abouserie, R. (1995). Self-esteem and achievement motivation as determinants of students' approaches to studying. Studies in Higher Education, 20(1), 19-26. doi:10.1080/03075079512331381770
Baltes, P. B. (1997). On the incomplete architecture of human ontogeny: Selection, optimization, and compensation as foundation of developmental theory. American Psychologist, 52(4), 366-380. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.52.4.366
English, L., Luckett, P., & Mladenovic, R. (2004). Encouraging a deep approach to learning through curriculum design. Accounting Education, 13(4), 461-488. doi:10.1080/0963928042000306828
Fagerhaugh, S. Y. (1973). Routing: Getting around with emphysema. The American Journal of Nursing, 73(1), 94-99. Retrieved from http://journals.lww.com/ajnonline/Abstract/1973/01000/Getting_Around_with_Emphysema_.15.aspx
Freund, A. M. (2008). Successful aging as management of resources: The role of selection, optimization, and compensation. Research in Human Development, 5(2), 94-106. doi:10.1080/15427600802034827
Glaser, B. G. (1978). Theoretical sensitivity: Advances in the methodology of grounded theory. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.
Glaser, B. G. (2012). No preconception: The dictum. Grounded Theory Review, 11(2). Retrieved from groundedtheoryreview.com
Grauerholz, L. (2001). Teaching holistically to achieve deep learning. College Teaching, 49(2), 44-50. doi:10.1080/87567550109595845
Green, J., & Binsardi, B. (2014). Systematic avocating. Grounded Theory Review, 13(2). Retrieved from groundedtheoryreview.com
Hall, M., Ramsay, A., & Raven, J. (2004). Changing the learning environment to promote deep learning approaches in first-year accounting students. Accounting Education, 13(4), 489-505. doi:10.1080/0963928042000306837
Howie, P., & Bagnall, R. (2012). A critique of the deep and surface approaches to learning model. Teaching in Higher Education, 18(4), 389-400. doi:10.1080/13562517.2012.733689
Jungert, T., & Rosander, M. (2009). Relationships between students' strategies for influencing their study environment and their strategic approach to studying. Studies in Higher Education, 34(2), 139-152. doi:10.1080/03075070802596970
Kolari, S., Savander-Ranne, C., & Viskari, E. L. (2006). Do our engineering students spend enough time studying? European Journal of Engineering Education, 31(5), 499-508. doi:10.1080/03043790600797061
Kolari, S., Savander-Ranne, C., & Viskari, E. L. (2008). Learning needs time and effort: A time-use study of engineering students. European Journal of Engineering Education, 33(5-6), 483-498. doi:10.1080/03043790802564046
Krohn, G. A., & O'Connor, C. M. (2005). Student effort and performance over the semester. The Journal of Economic Education, 36(1), 3-28. doi:10.3200/JECE.36.1.3-28
Ng, C. h. C. (2008). Multiple‐ goal learners and their differential patterns of learning. Educational Psychology, 28(4), 439-456. doi:10.1080/01443410701739470
Nonis, S. A., & Hudson, G. I. (2010). Performance of college students: Impact of study time and study habits. Journal of Education for Business, 85(4), 229-238. doi:10.1080/08832320903449550
Ramsden, P. (1992). Learning to teach in higher education. London, UK: Routledge.
Rozario, P. A., Kidahashi, M., & DeRienzis, D. R. (2011). Selection, optimization, and compensation: Strategies to maintain, maximize, and generate resources in later life in the face of chronic illnesses. Journal of Gerontological Social Work, 54(2), 224-239. doi:10.1080/01634372.2010.539589
Shih, S. S. (2005). Taiwanese sixth graders’ achievement goals and their motivation, strategy use, and grades: An examination of the multiple goal perspective. The Elementary School Journal, 106(1), 39-58. doi:10.1086/496906
Smith, T. W., & Colby, S. A. (2007). Teaching for deep learning. The Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas, 80(5), 205-210. doi:10.3200/TCHS.80.5.205-210