An Exploration of Key Issues in the Debate Between Classic and Constructivist Grounded Theory
Main Article Content
Abstract
In this paper, the debates and discourse between Classic GT or Constructivist GT are explored. The aim of this paper is to evaluate the various claims in a critical manner by revisiting the original discourse outlining these approaches. The importance of maintaining a reflective, neutral stance while examining the arguments and evidence for the claims on both sides of this debate is emphasized. In the final analysis, the view taken by these researchers was that valid arguments could be made to support Classic and Constructive GT approaches. The rationale for choosing a Classic GT methodology is outlined. Guidelines to support novice researchers in their task of choosing the most appropriate GT approach are suggested.
Downloads
Article Details
The Grounded Theory Review is an open access journal, which means that all content is freely available without charge to the user or his/her institution. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles in this journal without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author. This is in accordance with the international Budapest Open Access Initiative (BOAI) definition of open access.
References
Birks, M., & Mills, J. (2015). Grounded theory: A practical guide (2nd ed.). Los Angeles, CA: SAGE.
Bryant, A., & Charmaz, K. (2007). Grounded theory research: Methods and practices. In
Bryant,A. Charmaz, K. (Eds) Handbook of grounded theory (pp. 1-29). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
Carter, S. M., & Little, M. (2007). Justifying knowledge, justifying method, taking action: Epistemologies, Methodologies, and methods in qualitative research. Qualitative Health Research, 17(10), 1316-1328. doi:10.1177/1049732307306927
Charmaz, K. (2008). Constructionism and the grounded theory method. In J. A. Holstein, J.A., & Gubrium, J. F (Eds.), 2008 Handbook of constructionist research, (pp. 397-412). New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
Charmaz, K. (2014). Constructing grounded theory. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
Evans, G. L. (2013). A novice researcher’s first walk through the maze of grounded theory: Rationalization for classical grounded theory. Grounded Theory Review, 12(1), 37 - 55.
Fernandez, C. (2012). Guest editorial, themed section. The Grounded Theory Review, 11(1), 7-28.
Glaser, B. G. (1978). Theoretical sensitivity: Advances in the methodology of grounded theory. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.
Glaser, B. G. (1992). Basics of grounded theory analysis. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.
Glaser, B. G. (1998). Doing grounded theory: Issues and discussions. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.
Glaser, B. G. (2012). Constructivist Grounded Theory? The Grounded Theory Review, 11(1), 28- 38.
Glaser, B. G. (2016) The grounded theory perspective: Its origins and growth. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.
Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research: New York, NY: Aldine de Gruyter.
Glaser, B. G., & Tarozzi, M. (2007). Forty years after Discovery: Grounded theory worldwide. The Grounded Theory Review: An International Journal, Special Issue, 21-41.
Heath, H., & Cowley, S. (2004). Developing a grounded theory approach: a comparison of Glaser and Strauss. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 41(2), 141-150. doi:10.1016/S0020-7489(03)00113-5
Holton, J. A., & Walsh, I. (2016). Classic grounded theory: Applications with qualitative and quantitative data. Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications.
Hood, J. C. (2007). Orthodoxy vs. power: The defining traits of grounded theory. In Bryant, A. Charmaz,K. (Eds.). Handbook of grounded theory (pp.151-164). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
Jacoby, J., Jaccard, J. & Acock, A. (2011). Theory construction and model-building skills: a practical guide for social scientists. New York, NY: Guilford
O'Connor, M. K., Netting, F. E., & Thomas, M. L. (2008). Grounded theory: Managing the challenge for those facing institutional review board oversight. Qualitative Inquiry, 14(1), 28-45. doi:10.1177/1077800407308907
O’Reilly, K., Paper, D., & Marx, S. (2012). Demystifying Grounded theory for business Research. Organizational Research Methods, 15(2), 247-262. doi:10.1177/1094428111434559
Oliver, C. (2012). Critical realist grounded theory: A new approach for social work research. British Journal of Social Work, 42(2), 371-387. doi:10.1093/bjsw/bcr064
Urquhart, C. (2013). Grounded theory for qualitative research: A practical guide: Los Angeles, CA: SAGE.
Walsh, A., Meagher-Stewart, D., & Macdonald, M. (2015). Persistent optimizing: How mothers make food choices for their preschool children. Qualitative Health Research, 25(4), 527 –539.
Walsh, I., Holton, J. A., Bailyn, L., Fernandez, W., Levina, N., & Glaser, B. (2015). What grounded theory is . . . A critically reflective conversation among scholars. Organizational Research Methods, 18(4), 581-599. doi:10.1177/1094428114565028
Wiener, C. (2007). Making teams work in conducting grounded theory. In Bryant, A Charmaz, K. (Eds). Handbook of grounded theory (pp. 293-310). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.