Achieving Rigour and Relevance in Information Systems Studies Using grounded theory to investigate organizational cases
Main Article Content
Abstract
This paper builds on the belief that rigorous Information Systems (IS) research can help practitioners to better understand and to adapt to emerging situations. Contrary to the view seeing rigour and relevance as a dichotomy, it is maintained that IS researchers have a third choice; namely, to be both relevant and rigorous. The paper proposes ways in which IS research can contribute to easing the practitioners’ burden of adapting to changes by providing timely, relevant, and rigorous research. It is argued that synergy between relevance and rigour is possible and that classic grounded theory methodology in combination with case based data provides a good framework for rigorous and relevant research of emerging phenomena in information systems.
Downloads
Article Details
The Grounded Theory Review is an open access journal, which means that all content is freely available without charge to the user or his/her institution. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles in this journal without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author. This is in accordance with the international Budapest Open Access Initiative (BOAI) definition of open access.
References
Benbasat, I., & Zmud, R. W. (1999). Empirical Research in Information Systems: The Practice of Relevance. MIS Quarterly, 23(1), 316.
Brown, J. S., & Duguid, P. (1991). Organizational learning and communities-of-practice: Toward a unified view of working, learning, and innovation. Organization Science, 2(1), 40-57.
Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1994). Introduction. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of Qualitative Research (pp. 118). Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage Publications.
Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building Theories from Case Study Research. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532550.
Fernández, W. D. (2003). Trust and the Trust Placement Process in Metateam Projects. In D. Pauleen (Ed.), Virtual Teams: Projects, Protocols and Processes (pp. 40-69): Idea Group Inc.
Fernández, W. D., Lehmann, H. P., & Underwood, A. (2002, 6-8 June 2002). Rigour and Relevance in Studies of IS Innovation: A Grounded Theory Methodology approach. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the Xth European Conference on Information Systems
ECIS 2002: Information Systems and the Future of the Digital Economy, Gdansk, Poland.
Fernández, W. D., & Underwood, A. (2001, 4-7 December 2001). Metateams in Major IT Projects: A preliminary study. Paper presented at the
Proceedings of the Twelfth Australasian Conference on Information Systems, Coffs Harbour, NSW, Australia.
Fernández, W. D., & Underwood, A. (2003, 19-21 June 2003). Emerging Organisations: Metateams in Major IT Projects. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the XIth European Conference on Information Systems ECIS 2002: New Paradigms in Organisations, Markets and Society, Naples, Italy.
Gibbons, M., Limoges, H., Schwartzman, S., Scott, P., & Trow, M. (1994). The new production of knowledge: the dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies. London; Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage Publications.
Glaser, B. G. (1964). Organizational Scientists: their professional careers. Indianapolis: The Bobbs-Merrill Company, Inc.
Glaser, B.G., and Strauss, A.L., 1967. The discovery of grounded theory. Aldine Publishing Company, Hawthorne, New York, ch2-12.
Glaser, B. G. (1978). Theoretical Sensitivity: Advances in the methodology of grounded theory. Mill Valley, Calif: Sociology Press.
Glaser, B. G. 1992. Emergence vs. Forcing: Basics of grounded theory analysis. Sociology Press, Mill Valley, ch.1,2,5,8,11.
Glaser, B. G. (1998). Doing Grounded Theory: Issues and Discussions. Mill Valley, Calif: Sociology Press.
Glaser, B. G. (2001). The Grounded Theory Perspective: Conceptualization Contrasted with Description. Mill Valley, Calif: Sociology Press.
Glaser, B. G., & Holton, J. (2004). Remodeling grounded theory. Forum: Qualitative Sozialforschung/ Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 5(2).
Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1965). Awareness of Dying. New York: Aldine Publishing Company.
Goleman, D. (1998). Working with emotional intelligence. London: Bloomsbury.
Gray, P. (2001). Introduction to the Special Volume on Relevance. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 6(Article 1), 1-12.
Guba, E.G. and Lincoln, Y.S. 1994. Competing paradigms in qualitative research. In: Denzin, N. K., Lincoln, Y.
S., (Eds. Handbook of Qualitative Research. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, 105-117.
Kock, N., Gray, P., Hoving, R., Klein, H., Myers, M., & Rockart, J. (2001). IS Research Relevance Revisited: Subtle Accomplishment, Unfulfilled
Promise, or Serial Hypocrisy? Paper presented at the International Conference on Information Systems, New Orleans.
Kohli, R. (2001). Industry Academia Interaction: Key to IT Relevance. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 6(Article 15), 1-4.
Kroenke, D. M. (1992). Management information systems (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
Kuhn, T.S. , 1970. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, ch3,4.
Lee, A. S., 1989. Case Studies as Natural Experiments. Human Relations, 42 (2), 117-137
Lee, A. S., 1991: Integrating Positivist and Interpretive Approaches to Organizational Research. Organization Science, Volume 2, Number 4, 342-365.
Lee, A. S. (1999). Rigor and relevance in MIS research: Beyond the approach of positivism alone. MIS Quarterly, 23(1), 29-33.
Lehmann, H. P. (2001). A Grounded Theory of International Information Systems. Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Lehmann, H. P. (2002). The Design of Information Systems for the International Firm: A Grounded Theory of Some Critical Issues. In P. Palvia, S. Palvia & E. M. Roche (Eds.), Global Information Technology and Electronic Commerce: Issues for the New Millennium. Marietta, GA: Ivy League Publishing.
Lewin, K., & Cartwright, D. (1952). Field theory in social science: select theoretical papers. London: Tavistock.
Lofland, J., Lofland, L. H. 1995. Analysing social settings: a guide to qualitative observation and analysis. Wadsworth, New York, ch. 3,5,8.
Martin, P. Y., & Turner, B. A. (1986). Grounded Theory and Organizational Research. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 22(2), 141-157.
Mason, R. M. (2001). Not Either/Or: Research In Pasteur's Quadrant. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 6(Article 16), 1-12.
Melia, K. M. (1996). Rediscovering Glaser. Qualitative Health Research, 6(3), 368-378.
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., 1994. Qualitative data analysis: an expanded sourcebook. 2nd Ed. Sage Publications. Thousand Oaks, ch1,3-5,7.
Myers, M. D. 1997. Qualitative research in information systems. ‘Living Work’ first published May 1997 in MISQ Discovery at http://www.misq.org/misqd961/isworld/ Section: Introduction.
Nelson, C., Treichler, P. A., Grossberg, L. 1992. Cultural Studies. In (Grossberg, L., Nelson, C., Treichler, P. A., Eds.) Cultural Studies. Routledge, New York. p116
Nissen, H.E., Klein, H.K., & Hirschheim, R. A. (1991). Information systems research: contemporary approaches & emergent traditions. Amsterdam; New York: Elsevier Science Pub. Co. Orlikowski, W. J., & Baroudi, J. J. (1991). Studying Information Technology in Organizations: Research Approaches and Assumptions. Information Systems Research, 2(1), 1-28.
Partington, D. (2000). Building Grounded Theories of Management Action. British Journal of Management, 11, 91-102.
Robey, D., & Markus, M. L. (1998). Beyond rigor and relevance: Producing consumable research about information systems. Information Resources Management Journal, 11(1), 7-15.
Sarker, S., Lau, F., & Sahay, S. (2001). Using an adapted grounded theory approach for inductive theory building about virtual team development. Database for Advances in Information Systems, 32(1), 38-56.
Senn, J. (1998). The challenge of relating IS research to practice. Information Resources Management Journal, 11(1), 23-28.
Stern, P. N. (1994). Eroding Grounded Theory. In J. Morse (Ed.), Critical Issues in Qualitative Research Methods (pp. 212-223). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Stokes, D. E. (1997). Pasteur's quadrant: basic science and technological innovation. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution Press.
Strauss, A. L. 1987 Qualitative Analysis for Social Scientists. Cambridge University Press, ch25.
Strauss, A., Corbin, J. 1990. Basics of Qualitative Research. – Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques Sage Publications, London, ch29.
Urquhart, C. (1997). Exploring Analyst-Client Communication: Using Grounded Theory Techniques to Investigate Interaction in Informal Requirement Gathering. In A. S. Lee, J. Liebenau & J. I. DeGross (Eds.), Information Systems and Qualitative Research. London: Chapman and Hall.
Urquhart, C. (2001). An Encounter with Grounded Theory: Tackling the Practical and Philosophical Issues. In E. M. Trauth (Ed.), Qualitative Research in IS: Issues and Trends. Hershey, PA: Idea Group Publishing.
Van de Ven, A. H., & Poole, M. S. (1989). Methods for studying innovation processes. In A. H. Van de Ven, H. L. Angle & M. S. Poole (Eds.), Research on the Management of Innovation: The Minnesota Studies (pp. 31-54). New York: Harper & Row.
Walsham, G. (1993). Interpreting information systems in organizations. Chichester, West Sussex, England; New York: Wiley.
Walsham, G. (1995). Interpretive case studies in IS research: nature and method. European Journal of Information Systems, 4(2), 74-81.
Weber, M. (1968). Economy and society; an outline of interpretive sociology. New York: Bedminster Press.
Weick, K. E. (1979). The social psychology of organizing (2d ed.). Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley Pub. Co.
Yin, R.K. 1989. Case Study Research: Design and Methods. Sage Publications, Newbury Park, Ca, ch29.
Yin, R. K. (1994). Case study research: design and methods (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.