Qualitative Tussles in Undertaking a Grounded Theory Study
Main Article Content
Abstract
Those who’ve been trained to regard grounded theory as a qualitative research method frequently struggle to ‘unlearn’ qualitative data analysis dicta when undertaking a classic grounded theory study. A plethora of research methods texts that support this notion of grounded theory as a qualitative method are primarily responsible for the ensuing confusion. Further supporting this popular misconception are many papers published in leading academic journals and all too often the pressuring advice of thesis supervisors. This paper addresses specifically two issues that can create frustrating tussles for novice grounded theorists, especially in challenging such ‘authoritative’ perspectives: avoiding preconception and transcending descriptive detail. In addressing these persistent tussles, the reader is reminded of the fundamental distinction of grounded theory as a methodology for the emergent discovery of conceptually abstract theory from empirical data.
Downloads
Article Details
The Grounded Theory Review is an open access journal, which means that all content is freely available without charge to the user or his/her institution. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles in this journal without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author. This is in accordance with the international Budapest Open Access Initiative (BOAI) definition of open access.
References
Baszanger, I. (1997). Deciphering Chronic Pain. In A. Strauss & J. M. Corbin (Eds.), Grounded Theory in Practice. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, pp. 1-34.
Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing Grounded Theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Clarke, A.E. (1997). A Social Worlds Research Adventure: The case of reproductive science. In A. Strauss & J. M. Corbin (Eds.), Grounded Theory in Practice. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, pp. 63-94.
Clarke, A.E. (2005). Situational Analysis: Grounded theory after the postmodern turn. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Dey, I. (1999). Grounding Grounded Theory. San Diego: Academic Press.
Glaser, B. G. (1978). Theoretical Sensitivity: Advances in the methodology of grounded theory. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.
Glaser, B. G. (1992). Basics of Grounded Theory: Emergence vs. forcing. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.
Glaser, B. G. (1998). Doing Grounded Theory: Issues and discussions. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.
Glaser, B. G. (2001). The Grounded Theory Perspective: Conceptualization contrasted with description. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.
Glaser, B. (2002). Conceptualization: On theory and theorizing using grounded theory. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 1 (2). Article 3. Retrieved November 21, 2009 from http://www.ualberta.ca/~ijqm/
Glaser, B. G. (2003). The Grounded Theory Perspective II: Description's remodeling of grounded theory methodology. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.
Glaser, B. G. (2004). Naturalist Inquiry and Grounded Theory. In Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research. Retrieved November 21, 2009, from http://www.qualitative-research.net/fqs-texte/1-04/1-04glaser-e.htm
Glaser, B. G. (2005). The Grounded Theory Perspective III: Theoretical coding. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.
Glaser, B. G., & Holton, J. (2004). Remodeling Grounded Theory. In Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research. Retrieved November 21, 2009, from http://www.qualitative-research.net/fqs- texte/2-04/2-04glaser-e.htm
Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Hawthorne, NY: Aldine de Gruyter. Goode, W. J. (1960). A Theory of Role Strain. American Sociological Review, 25, 483-496.
Goulding, C. (2002). Grounded Theory: A practical guide for management, business and market researchers. London: Sage.
Holton, J.A. (2008). Grounded Theory as a General Research Methodology. The Grounded Theory Review, 7(2), 67-93. Konecki, K. (1997). Time in the Recruiting Search Process by Headhunting Companies. In A. Strauss & J. M. Corbin (Eds.), Grounded Theory in Practice. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE, pp. 131-145.
Locke, K. (2001). Grounded Theory in Management Research. London: SAGE. Madill, A., Jordan, A., & Shirley, C. (2000). Objectivity and Reliability in Qualitative Analysis: Realist, contextualist and radical constructionist epistemologies. British Journal of Psychology, 91, 1-20.
Marshall, C., & Rossman, G. B. (1999). Designing Qualitative Research (3rd Ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
Martin, V.B. (2006). The Postmodern Turn: Shall classic grounded theory take that detour? A review essay. The Grounded Theory Review, 5 (2/3), 119-128.
Morse, J. M. (Ed.). (1997). Completing a qualitative research project: Details and dialogue. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Morse, J.M. (2004). Constructing Qualitatively Derived Theory: Concept construction and concept typologies. Qualitative Health Research, 14(10), 1387-1395.
Partington, D. (Ed.). (2002). Essential Skills for Management Research. London: Sage. Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative Research & Evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Schatzman, L. (1991). Dimensional Analysis: Notes on an alternative approach to the grounding of theory in qualitative research. In D. R. Maines (Ed.), Social Organisation and Social Process. Aldine De Gruyter: New York, pp. 303-314.
Strauss, A. L., & Corbin, J. M. (1990). Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Strauss, A. L., & Corbin, J. M. (1998). Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage. Whitehead, Alfred North. (1925). Science and the Modern World. New York: Macmillan.