Stabilising of Life A substantive theory
Main Article Content
Abstract
The purpose of this grounded theory study was to explore how families live after one parent has been diagnosed with cancer and to develop a substantive theory to explain how families solve the main concern in their lives. The study design was prospective using 32 joint couple conversations with parents of 13 families (N=26) during different stages of the cancer trajectory as well as 26 hours of observations of five families, including ten parents and nine children (N=19), collected during a boarding course on psychosocial rehabilitation. The data consisted of 2377 incidents and a memo fund of 97 pages. The main concern of families was how to respond to the shock of a parent falling ill with cancer. The core category was stabilising of life through facing of hardships and assuming an attitude towards the future which patterned out as detaching, fighting, adjusting and submitting.
Downloads
Article Details
The Grounded Theory Review is an open-access journal, which means that all content is freely available without charge to the user or his/her institution. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles in this journal without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author. This is in accordance with the international Budapest Open Access Initiative (BOAI) definition of open access.
References
Anderson K, & Tomlinson P. The family health system as an emerging paradigmatic view for nursing. Image: The Journal of Nursing Scholarship 1992; 24:57-63.
Anderson K. The family health system approach to family systems nursing. Journal of Family Nursing 2000; 6:103- 119.
Åstedt-Kurki P, Lehti K, Paunonen M, & Paavilainen E. Family member as a hospital patient: sentiments and functioning of the family: International Journal of Nursing Practise, 1999; 5: 155-163.
Clarke-Steffen L. Reconstructing reality: family strategies for managing childhood cancer. Journal of Pediatric Nursing 1997; 12: 278-287.
Cooley M, & Moriarty H. An analysis of empirical studies examining the impact of the cancer diagnosis and treatment of an adult on family functioning. Journal of Family Nursing 1997; 3: 318-347.
Eriksson E. A description of the help received by cancer patient’s relatives in their adjustment. Doctoral Dissertation. 1996, Annales Universitatis Turkuensis. Ser. D, vol. 219. University of Turku, Turku, Finland.
Eriksson E. Caring for cancer patients: relatives´ assessments of received care. European Journal of Cancer Care 2001; 10: 48-55.
Eriksson E, & Lauri S. Informational and emotional support for cancer patients´ relatives. European Journal of Cancer Care 2000a; 9:8-15.
Eriksson E, & Lauri S. Participation of relatives in the care on cancer patients. European Journal of Oncology Nursing 2000b; 4: 99-107.
Glaser B. Theoretical sensitivity: Advances in the methodology of grounded theory. 3 rd printing. Sociology Press, Mill Valley, California, 1978.
Glaser B. Doing grounded theory: Issues and discussions. Sociology Press, Mill Valley, California, 1998.
Glaser B. The grounded theory perspective: Conceptualization contrasted with description. Sociology Press, Mill Valley, California, 2001.
Inoue S, Saeki T, Mantani T, Okamura H, & Yamawaki S. Factors related to patient’s mental adjustment to breast cancer: patient characteristics and family functioning. Supportive Care of Cancer 2003; 11: 178-184.
Jussila A-L. Stabilising of Life – A Substantive Theory of Family Survivorship with a Parent with Cancer. Doctoral dissertation, 2004. Acta Universitatis Tamperensis 1042. Tampere University Press, Tampere. Finland.
Killoran M, Schlitz M, & Lewis N. ”Unremarkable” recoveries: normalizing adversity and cancer survival. Qualitative Health Research 2002; 12: 208-222.
Kissane D, Bloch S, Burns I, Patrick J, Wallace C, & McKenzie D. Perceptions of family functioning and cancer. Psycho- Oncology 1994; 3: 259-269.
Kuuppelomäki M. Cancer patients´, family members´ and professional helpers´ conceptions and beliefs concerning death. European Journal of Oncology Nursing 2000; 4:39-47.
Lindholm L, Rehnsfeldt A, Arman M, & Hamrin E. Significant others´ experience of suffering when living with women with breast cancer. Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences 2002; 16:248-255.
McCubbin M, & McCubbin H. Resiliency in families: a conceptual model of family adjustment and adaptation in response to stress and crises. In Family assessment: resiliency, coping and adaptation – inventories for research and practice (McCubbin H, Thompson A, McCubbin M ed.), 1996, University of Wisconsin System, Madison, Wisconsin, 1-64.
Mellon S. Comparisons between cancer survivors and family members on meaning of the illness and family quality of life. Oncology Nursing Forum 2002, 29: 1117-1125.
Mellon S, & Northouse L. Family survivorship and quality of life following a cancer diagnosis. Research in Nursing & Health 2001; 24: 446-459.
Shepard M, Carroll R, Mahon M, Moriarty H, Feetham S, Deatrick J, & Orsi A. Conceptual and pragmatic considerations in conducting a secondary analysis: an example from research of families. Western Journal on Nursing Research 1999; 21: 154-167.
Taylor E. Transformation of tragedy among women surviving breast cancer. Oncology Nursing Forum 2000; 27: 781-788.