On-the-Job Ethics - Proximity Morality Forming in Medical School A grounded theory analysis using survey data
Main Article Content
Abstract
On-the-job-ethics exist in all businesses and can also be called proximity morality forming. In this paper we propose that medical students take a proximity morality stance towards ethics education at medical school. This means that they want to form physician morality “on the job” instead of being taught ethics like any other subject. On-the-job-ethics for medical students involves learning ethics that is used when practicing ethics. Learning ethics includes comprehensive ethics courses in which quality lectures provide ethics grammar useful for the ethics practicing in attitude exercises and vignette reflections in tutored group discussions. On-the-job-ethics develops professional identity, handles diversity of religious and existential worldviews, trains students described as ethically naive, processes difficult clinical experiences, and desists negative role modeling from physicians in clinical or teaching situations. This grounded theory analysis was made from a questionnaire survey on attitudes to ethics education with 409 Swedish medical students participating. We analyzed over 8000 words of open-ended responses and multiple choice questions using classic grounded theory procedures, but also compared questionnaire data using statistics such as multiple regression models. The paper gives an example of how grounded theory can be used with a limited amount of survey data.
Downloads
Article Details
The Grounded Theory Review is an open-access journal, which means that all content is freely available without charge to the user or his/her institution. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles in this journal without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author. This is in accordance with the international Budapest Open Access Initiative (BOAI) definition of open access.
References
Andre, J., Brody, H., Fleck, L., Thomason, C.L., & Tomlinson, T. (2003). Ethics, professionalism, and humanities at Michigan State University College of Human Medicine. Academic Medicine, 78, 968-72.
Brinchmann, B.S., & Nortvedt, P. (2001). Ethical decision making in neonatal units–the normative significance of vitality. Medicine, Health Care & Philosophy, 4, 193-200.
Fyrenius, A., Bergdahl, B., & Silen, C. (2005). Lectures in problem-based learning–why, when and how? An example of interactive lecturing that stimulates meaningful learning. Medical Teacher, 27, 61-5.
Glaser, B.G. (1978). Theoretical sensitivity: Advances in the methodology of grounded theory. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.
Glaser, B.G. (1998). Doing grounded theory: Issues and discussions. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.
Glaser, B.G. (2001). The grounded theory perspective I: Conceptualization contrasted with description. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.
Glaser, B.G. (2003). The grounded theory perspective II: Description’s remodeling of grounded theory. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.
Glaser, B.G. (2005). The grounded theory perspective III: Theoretical coding. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.
Glaser, B.G., & Strauss, A.L. (1967). Discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago, IL: Aldine.
Gross, M.L.(1999). Ethics Education and Physician Morality. Social Science & Medicine 49:329-42.
Hafferty, F.W. & Franks, R. (1994). The hidden curriculum, ethics teaching, and the structure of medical education. Academic Medicine, 69, 861-71.
Levinas, E. (1969). Totality and infinity. Pittsburg, PA: Duquesne University Press.
Lynöe, N., Löfmark, R.,& Thulesius, H. (2008). Teaching medical ethics: What is the impact of role models? Some experiences from Swedish medical schools. Journal of Medical Ethics, 34, 315-6.
Nortvedt, P., & Nordhaug, M. (2008). The principle and problem of proximity in ethics. Journal of Medical Ethics, 34, 156-61.
O’Cathain, A., & Thomas, K.J. (2004). “Any other comments?” Open questions on questionnaires – a bane or a bonus to research? BMC Medical Research Methodology, 4, 25.
Sander, P., Stevenson, K., King, M., & Coates, D. (2000). University students’ expectations of teaching. Studies in Higher Education, 25, 309-323.
Sandgren, A., Thulesius, H., Fridlund, B., & Petersson, K. (2006). Striving for emotional survival in palliative cancer nursing. Qualitative Health Research, 16, 79-96.
Thulesius, H., & Grahn, B. (2007). Reincentivizing – a new theory of work and work absence. BMC Health Services Research, 7,:100
Thulesius, H., Håkansson, A., & Petersson, K. (2003). Balancing: a basic process in end-of-life cancer care. Qualitative Health Research, 10, 1353-77.
Thulesius, H., Sallin, K., Lynöe, N., & Löfmark, R. (2007). Proximity morality in medical school–medical students forming physician morality “on the job”: grounded theory analysis of a student survey. BMC Medical Education, 7, 27.