Selection of Grounded Theory as an Appropriate Research Methodology for a Dissertation One student’s perspective
Main Article Content
Abstract
Doctoral students wanting to use grounded theory as a methodological approach for their dissertation often face multiple
challenges gaining acceptance of their approach by their committee.
This paper presents the case that the author used to overcome these challenges through the process of eliminating other methodologies, leaving grounded theory as the preferred method for the desired research issue. Through examining the approach used successfully by the author, other doctoral students will be able to frame similar arguments justifying the use of grounded theory in their dissertations and seeing the use of the method continue to spread into new fields and applications. This paper examines the case built for selecting grounded theory as a defensible dissertation approach. The basic research issue that I wanted to investigate was how practitioners in an applied field sought information in their work; in other words, how they researched. I further narrowed the investigation down to a more specific field, but the paper presented here is left in broader form so that other students can see the approach in more general terms.
Downloads
Article Details
The Grounded Theory Review is an open-access journal, which means that all content is freely available without charge to the user or his/her institution. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles in this journal without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author. This is in accordance with the international Budapest Open Access Initiative (BOAI) definition of open access.
References
Boulmetis, J., & Dutwin, P. The ABCs of evaluation: Timeless techniques for program and project managers (2nd ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Brause, R. S. (2000). Writing your doctoral dissertation: Invisible rules for success. London: Routledge Falmer.
Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (Eds.). (2005). The Sage handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed.) Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Doyle, A. C. (1950). The sign of the four. In The adventures of Sherlock Holmes. NY: Heritage.
Gay, L. R., & Airasian, P. (2003). Educational research: Competencies for analysis and applications (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
Glaser, B. G. (1998). Doing grounded theory: Issues and discussions. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.
Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. New
Brunswick, NJ: Aldine Transaction. Glatthorn, A. A., & Joyner, R. L. (2005). Writing the winning thesis or dissertation: A step-by-step guide (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
Groat, L. & Wang, D. (2002). Architectural research methods. New York: Wiley.
Hodkinson, P., & Hodkinson, H. (2001, December). The strengths and limitations of case study research. In Learning and Skills Development Agency conference: Making an impact on policy and practice. Retrieved June 28, 2007 from www.sfeu.ac.uk/documents/1553/
Madsen, D. (1992). Successful dissertations and theses: A guide to graduate student research from proposal to completion (2nd ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Merriam, S. B., & Simpson, E. L. (2000). A guide to research for educators and trainers of adults (2nd Edition). Malabar, FL: Krieger.