Learning Classic Grounded Theory An account of the journey and advice for new researchers
Main Article Content
Abstract
Graduate students who employ CGT for their theses or dissertations predominantly learn the methodology on their own. As a distinct methodology, CGT is challenging to employ. This challenge increases further when graduate students encounter poor advice from dissertation supervisors who are unfamiliar with the methodology, or attempt to incorporate elements from the many alternative and modified versions of grounded theory presented in the literature. This article provides an account of one student’s experience learning CGT to complete her doctoral dissertation. It is hoped that this article will assist other new researchers to anticipate some of the confusion, challenges, and insights, and growth that they may encounter in their first CGT study. The article concludes with advice for new researchers including: seek expertise, engage in community, just do it, know self, and balance challenge and support.
Downloads
Article Details
The Grounded Theory Review is an open-access journal, which means that all content is freely available without charge to the user or his/her institution. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles in this journal without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author. This is in accordance with the international Budapest Open Access Initiative (BOAI) definition of open access.
References
Boardman, K., Detweiler, J., Emmerling, H., Lucas, B. E., & Schmidt, K. M. (2002). Adding the field to the work: A dramatic re-enactment of a qualitative research seminar. Composition Studies, 30(2), 79-107.
Bowen, G. A. (2005). Preparing a qualitative research-based dissertation: Lessons learned. The Qualitative Report, 10(2), 208-222.
Clark, R. & Lang, A. (2002). Balancing yin and yang: Teaching and learning qualitative data analysis within an undergraduate quantitative analysis course. Teaching Sociology, 30(3), 348-360.
Christiansen, O. (2006). Opportunizing: A classic grounded theory on business and management. The Grounded Theory Review, 6(1), 109-133.
Crotty, M. (2003). The foundations of social research: Meaning and perspective in the research process. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Davie, L. E. (1996). Learning qualitative research: electronic learning circles. Qualitative Health Research, 6(3), 453-457.
Drago-Severson, E., Asghar, A., Gaylor, S. S. (2003). Learning qualitative data analysis in a North American university: Teaching reflections on creating supports and scaffolds for researcher development. 27pages; Paper presented at the Annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association (Chicago, IL, April 21-25, 2003).
Efinger, J., Maldonado, N., & McArdle, G. (2004). PhD students’ perceptions of the relationship between philosophy and research: A qualitative investigation. The Qualitative Report, 9(4), 732-759.
Gale, J. (1990). A novel experience: A classroom exercise for exploring patterns. The Qualitative Report, 1(1). Retrieved November 18, 2008, from http://www.nova.edu/ssss/QR/QR1-1/gale.html.
Glaser, B. (1978). Theoretical Sensitivity: Advances in the methodology of grounded theory. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.
Glaser, B. G. (1998). Doing grounded theory: Issues and discussions. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.
Glaser, B. G. (2001). The grounded theory perspective: Conceptualization contrasted with description. Mill Valley, CA: Sociol ogy Press.
Glaser, B. G., & Holton, J. (2004). Remodeling grounded theory. Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 5(2), Article 4. Retrieved November 18, 2008, from http://www.qualitativeresearch.net/
Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago: Adline Publishing Company.
Hein, S. F. (2004). “I don’t like ambiguity”: An exploration of students’ experience during a qualitative methods course. Alberta Journal of Educational Research 50(1), 22-38.
Holton, J. A. (2007). The coding process and its challenges. In A.
Bryant, & K. Charmaz (Eds.), The Sage handbook of grounded theory. (pp. 265-289). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Huehls, F. (2005). An evening of grounded theory: Teaching process through demonstration and stimulation. The Qualitative Report 10(2), 328-338.
Hughes, M. & Berry, A. (2000). Learning by doing: A case study of qualitative accounting research. Accounting Education9(2), 157-174.
Lee, S. & Roth, W. M. (2003). Becoming and belonging: Learning qualitative research through legitimate peripheral participation. Forum: Qualitative Social Research 4(2) Article 35, Retrieved November 18, 2008, from http://www.qualitative-research.net/.
Pascarella, E. T. & Terenzini, P. T. (1991). How college affects students: Findings and insights from twenty years of research. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Pascarella, E. T., & Terenzini, P. T. (2005). How college affects students: A third decade of research. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Paul, J. L. & Marfo, K. (2001). Preparation of educational researchers in philosophical foundations of inquiry. Review of Educational Research, 71(4), 525-547.
Poulin, K. L. (2007). Teaching qualitative research: Lessons from practice. The Counseling Psychologist 35(3), 431-458. Schreiber, R. S. (2001). The “how to” of grounded theory: Avoiding the pitfalls. In R.S. Schreiber & P.N. Stern (Eds.), Using grounded theory in nursing (pp. 55-84). New York: Springer.
Shaffir, W.B. & Stebbins, R. A. (1991). Experiencing fieldwork: An inside view of qualitative research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
Strauss, A. (1988). Teaching qualitative research methods courses: A conversation with Anselm Strauss. Qualitative Studies in Education 1(1), 91-99.
Tantano Beck, C. (2003). Intiation into qualitative data analysis. Journal of Nursing Education, 42(5), 231-234.