Navigating New Experiences
Main Article Content
Abstract
This grounded theory study was initiated to discover the process adult learners go through when engaging in new learning experiences. Data came from 12 open-ended intensive interviews with adult learners involved in various educational endeavors. Theoretical sampling led to several additional interviews with individuals not engaged in post-secondary education but more generally in new learning experiences. The basic social process of navigating explains three cyclical stages of behaviors used to successfully traverse new experiences. The stages are Mapping, Embarking, and Reflecting. Mapping consists of three behaviors: locating, assessing one’s location in relation to the goal; surveying, gathering information; and plotting, creating a plan. Embarking involves engaging in normalizing and strategizing behaviors to guide one’s self through the experience while encountering unexpected factors that influence one’s course and progress. Reflecting techniques and approaches are discussed in the third stage. Although providing an understanding of the process and behaviors used by adult learners, the theory is also applicable in other settings.
Downloads
Article Details
The Grounded Theory Review is an open-access journal, which means that all content is freely available without charge to the user or his/her institution. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles in this journal without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author. This is in accordance with the international Budapest Open Access Initiative (BOAI) definition of open access.
References
Berger, C. R. (1997). Planning strategic interaction: Attaining goals through communicative action. Mahwah, NJ: LEA.
Bigby D. G. (2003). Quality control manager-selection report with structured interview. Retrieved March 8, 2005 from https://www.bigby.com/systems/assessv2/360/PDFReports/2005042418141232809974.PDF.
Bosworth, B., Callahan, A., Choitz, V., Davidson, C., Hoops, J., Kazis, R., & McLeod, A. (2007). Adult learners in higher education: Barriers to success and strategies to improve results. Retrieved May 20, 2008 from http://www.jff.org/KnowledgeCenter/Adult+Learners+in+Higher+Education:+Barriers+to+Success+and+Strategies +to+Improve+Results.html
Boud, D., Keogh, R., & Walker, D. (1985). Promoting reflection in learning: A model. In D.
Boud, R. Keogh, & D. Walker (Eds.), Reflection: Turning experience into learning (pp. 18-40). London: Kogan Page.
Boud, D., and Walker, D. (1992). In the midst of experience: Developing a model to aid learners
and facilitators. In J. Mulligan and C. Griffin (eds.), Empowerment through experiential learning (pp. 163-169). London: Kogan Page.
Brems, C. (2001). Basic skill in psychotherapy and counseling. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
Burgstahler, S. & Cronheim, D. (2001, Fall). Supporting peerpeer and mentor-protégé relationships on the internet. Journal of Research on Technology in Education 34(1), 59- 74.
Carver, C. & Scheier, M. (1998). On the self-regulation of behavior. New York: Cambridge
University Press. Ford, M. E. (1992). Motivating humans: Goals, emotions and personal agency beliefs. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
Glaser, B. G. (1978). Theoretical sensitivity. Mill Valley, CA: The Sociology Press.
Glaser, B. G. (1992). Basics of grounded theory analysis. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.
Glaser, B. G. (1998). Doing grounded theory: Issues and discussions. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.
Glaser, B. G. (2003). The grounded theory perspective II. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.
Glaser, B. G. & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.
Griffiths, L. (2004, May). Time for reflection. Occupational Health, 56(5), 20-21. International Coaching Federation. (2008). What is coaching? Retrieved June 1, 2008, from http://www.coachfederation.org/ICF/For+Coaching+Client s/What+is+a+Coach/
Joireman, J. A., Parrott, L. & Hammersla, J. (2002). Empathy and the self-absorption paradox: Support for the distinction between self-rumination and self-reflection. Self and Identity, 1, 53- 65.
Kottler, J. A. (2001). Making changes last. Philadelphia: Brunner-Routledge.
Levy, D. L. (2000). Applications and limitations of complexity theory in organization theory and strategy. In J. Rabin, G. Miller and W. Hildreth (eds.), Handbook of Strategic Management (2nd ed.). New York: Marcel Dekker. Retrieved Dec 28, 2004, from www.faculty.umb.edu/david_levy/complex00.pdf.
Merriam, S. & Caffarella, R. (1999). Learning in adulthood: A comprehensive guide (2nd ed). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Mezirow, J. (1991). Transformative dimensions of adult learning. San Francisco, CA: Jossey - Bass.
Mezirow, J. (1996). Contemporary paradigms of learning. Adult Education Quarterly, 46(3), 158-172.
Simmons, O. and Gregory, T. (2003, September). Grounded action: Achieving Optimal and sustainable change. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research [On-line Journal], 4(3). Retrieved March 20, 2004, from http://www.qualitative-research.net/fqs-texte/3-03/3- 03simmonsgregory-e.htm.
Wolanin, T. (2003). HEA: Reauthorizing the Higher Education Act. The Institute of higher education policy Retrieved from http://www.ihep.org/assets/files//publications/MR/ReauthorizingHEA.pdf on February 7, 2008.