Is That a Real Theory or Did You Just Make It Up? Teaching Classic Grounded Theory
Main Article Content
Abstract
The title of this paper was derived from an incident I observed some years ago while accompanying a highly talented musician-songwriter friend to a performance. During a break, an audience member approached him to compliment the last song he had performed. He had written both the music and the lyrics to the song, one of many he had written. The audience member queried, “Is that a real song, or did you just make it up?” A touch amused, and not knowing whether he should be flattered or insulted, he politely replied, “It is a real song and I made it up.”
This episode puts in mind a similar attitude in the social sciences that Glaser and Strauss (1967) noted, in which a small number of ’theoretical capitalists’ originate what are considered to be “real” theories and others are relegated to the role of “proletariat” testers. The means by which these theorists derived their theories remained largely mysterious. Unleashing proletariat testers was one of the chief rationales behind Glaser and Strauss’ development of grounded theory. It brought a democratic option into the social sciences that enabled anyone who learned the methodology to generate theory. The democratic ethos of the methodology may also have inadvertently unleashed an abundance of aspiring remodelers of the methodology, who unfortunately have eroded its primary purpose—to generate theories that are fully grounded in data rather than speculation or ideology.
Downloads
Article Details
The Grounded Theory Review is an open access journal, which means that all content is freely available without charge to the user or his/her institution. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles in this journal without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author. This is in accordance with the international Budapest Open Access Initiative (BOAI) definition of open access.
References
Baker, C.; Wuest, J. & Stern, P. (1992). Method slurring: The phenomenology/grounded theory example, Journal of Advanced N ursing, 17 , 1355-1360.
Charmaz, K. (2000). Grounded theory: Objectivist and constructivist methods. In N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research , 2nd edition (pp.509-535). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grou nded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. Los Angeles: Sage.
Corbin, J.M. (1998). Alternative interpretations – Valid or not? Theory and P sychology . 8 (1), 121-128.
Glaser, B.G. (1965). The constant comparative method of qualitative analysis. Social Problems , 12 (4), pp. 436–445.
Glaser, B.G. (1978). Theoretical sensitivity . Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.
Glaser, B.G. (1992). Basics of grounded theory analysis: Emergence vs. forcing . Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.
Glaser, B.G. (1993). (Ed.). Examples of grounded theory: A reader. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.
Glaser, B.G. (1994) (Ed.). More grounded theory methodology: A reader. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.
Glaser, B.G. (1995). (Ed.). Grounded Theory: 1984 - 1994. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.
Glaser, B. G. (1996). (Ed.). Gerund grounded theory: The basic social process dissertation . Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.
Glaser, B.G. (1998). Doing grounded theory: Issues and discussions . Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.
Glaser, B. G. (2001). The grounded theory perspective: Conceptualization contrasted with description. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.
Glaser, B. G. (2002). Constructivist Grounded Theory? Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research , 3 (3), Art. 12,
http://nbnresolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs0203125
Glaser, B.G. (2003). The grounded theory perspective II:nDescription’s remodeling of grounded theory methodology. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.
Glaser, B. with the assistance of J. Holton (2004). Remodeling grounded theory. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research , 5 (2), Art. 4, http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs040245.
Glaser, B. (2005a). The grounded theory perspective III: Theoretical coding . Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.
Glaser, B. with the assistance of J. Holton (2005b). Staying open: The use of theoretical codes in grounded theory. The Grounded Theory Review . 5 (1), pp.1-20.
Glaser, B.G. (2006). Doing formal grounded theory: A proposal. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.
Glaser, B.G. (2008). Doing quantitative grounded theory . Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.
Glaser, B.G. (2009). Jargonizing: Using the grounded theory vocabulary . Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.
Glaser, B. G. & Strauss, A.L. (1965). Awareness of d ying. Chicago: Aldine.
Glaser, B. G. & Strauss, A.L. (1968). Time for d ying . Chicago: Aldine.
Glaser, B. G. & Strauss, A.L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory : Strategies for qualitative research . Chicago: Aldine.
Glaser, B.G. & Holton, J.A. (2007). (Eds.). The grounded theory seminar reader . Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.
Greckhamer, T. & Koro-Ljungberg, M. (2005). The erosion of a method: Examples from grounded theory. International journal of qualitative studies in education. 18 (6), 729-750.
Haig, B.D. (1995). Grounded theory as scientific method, Philosophy of Education, available at http://www.ed.uiuc.edu/eps/pes-Yearbook/95_docs/haig.html
Kools, S., McCarthy, M., Durham, R., Robrecht, L. (1996). Dimensional analysis: Broadening the conception of grounded theory. Qualitative Health Research . 6 (3), 312-330.
May, K.A. (1996). Diffusion, dilution, or distillation? The case of grounded theory method.Qualitative Health Research. 6 (3), 309-311.
Mills, J., Bonner, A., & Francis, K. (2006). Adopting a constructivist to grounded theory: Implications for research design. International J ournal of Nursing Practice . 12 (1), 8-13.
Raffanti, M. (2006). Grounded theory in educational research: Exploring the concept of “groundedness.” In P. Brewer & M. Firmin (Eds.), Ethnographic and q ualitative research in education: Proceedings of the eighteenth annual conference . Newcastle, UK: Cambridge Scholars Press, pp. 61-76.
Simmons, O. E. (1995). Illegitimate uses of the “grounded theory” title. In B. G. Glaser (Ed.), Grounded Theory 1984 - 1994 (pp. 163-169). Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.
Simmons, O.E. & Gregory, T.A. (2003). Grounded action: Achieving optimal and sustainable change. Forum: Qualitative Social Research , 4 (3).
Stern, P.N. (1994). Eroding grounded theory. In J.M. Morse (Ed.). Critical issues in qualitative research methods . (pp. 215-223). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Strauss, A. L., (1987). Qualitative Analysis f or Social Scientists. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Strauss, A. & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques . Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Strauss, A. & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory . (2nd Ed.) Newbury Park, CA: Sage.