Dynasting Theory: Lessons in learning grounded theory

Main Article Content

Johnben Teik-Cheok Loy

Abstract

This article captures the key learning lessons gleaned from the author's experience learning and developing a grounded theory for his doctoral dissertation using the classic methodology as conceived by Barney Glaser. The theory was developed through data gathered on founders and successors of Malaysian Chinese family-own businesses. The main concern for Malaysian Chinese family businesses emerged as dynasting the building, maintaining, and growing the power and resources of the business within the family lineage. The core category emerged as dynasting across cultures, where founders and successors struggle to transition from traditional Chinese to hybrid cultural and modernized forms of family business from one generation to the next. The key learning lessons were categorized under five headings: (a) sorting through different versions of grounded theory, (b) educating and managing research stakeholders, (c) embracing experiential learning, (d) discovering the core category: grounded intuition, and (e) recognizing limitations and possibilities.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Teik-Cheok Loy, J. (2011). Dynasting Theory: : Lessons in learning grounded theory. Grounded Theory Review, 10(02), 45–62. Retrieved from https://groundedtheoryreview.org/index.php/gtr/article/view/88
Section
Articles

References

Bond, M. H. (1991). Beyond the Chinese face: Insights from psychology. Hong Kong: Oxford University Press.

Bond, M. H. & Hwang, K.-K. (1986). The social psychology of

Chinese people. In M. H. Bond (Ed.), The psychology of the Chinese people (pp. 213-264). Hong Kong: Oxford University Press.

Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing Grounded Theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. Los Angeles, CA: Sage Publications.

Corbin, J. M. & Strauss, A. L. (2008). Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Glaser, B. G. (1978). Theoretical Sensitivity. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.

Glaser, B. G. (1992). Basics of Grounded Theory Analysis. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.

Glaser, B. G. (1998). Doing Grounded Theory: Issues and discussions. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.

Glaser, B. G. (2005). The Grounded Theory Perspective III: Theoretical coding. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.

Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The Discovery of Grounded Theory. Chicago: Aldine.

Holton, J. A. (2006). Rehumanising Knowledge Work Through Fluctuating Support Networks: A grounded theory. Unpublished doctoral thesis, University of Northampton, UK.

Holton, J. A. (2007). The coding process and its challenges. In K. Bryant, K. Charmaz (Eds.), The Sage Handbook of Grounded Theory (pp. 265-289). Los Angeles, CA: Sage Publications.

Lichtman, M. (2011). Understanding and Evaluating

Qualitative Educational Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Loy, J. T-C. (2010). Dynasting Across Cultures: A grounded

theory of Malaysian Chinese family firms (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from http://purl.umn.edu/94299

Redding, S. G. (1993). The Spirit of Chinese Capitalism. New

York: de Gruyter.

Van den Hoonaard, W. (Ed.). (2002). Walking the Tightrope:

Ethical issues for qualitative researchers. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

Yeung, H. W. C. (2004). Chinese Capitalism in a Global Era: Towards hybrid capitalism. New York: Routledge.