A Grounded Theory of Moral Reckoning in Nursing
Main Article Content
Abstract
Moral distress is a pervasive problem in nursing, contributing to nurses’ emotional and physical health problems, loss of nurses’ ethical integrity, dissatisfaction with the work of nursing, and loss of nurses from the workforce. The purpose of this research was twofold: 1) to further elucidate the experiences and consequences of professional nurses’ moral distress and 2) to formulate a logical, systematic, and explanatory theory of moral distress and its consequences. METHOD: This Glaserian grounded theory study utilized volunteer and purposive sampling to recruit 21 registered nurses. Analysis of the data resulted in an original substantive theory of moral reckoning in nursing, which reaches further than the concept of moral distress, identifying a critical juncture in nurses’ lives and better explaining a process that affects nurses and the health care that they deliver. Results: Moral reckoning in nursing consists of a three-stage process. After a novice period, the nurse experiences a Stage of Ease in which there is comfort in the workplace and congruence of internal and external values. Unexpectedly, a situational bind occurs in which the nurse’s core beliefs come into irreconcilable conflict with social norms. This forces the nurse out of the Stage of Ease into the Stage of Resolution, in which the nurse either gives up or makes a stand. The nurse then moves into the Stage of Reflection in which beliefs, values, and actions are iteratively examined. The nurse tries to make sense of experiences through remembering, telling the story, examining conflicts, and living with the consequences. Implications: In today’s complex health care system, nurses find themselves faced with morally troubling situations which if not resolved can lead to serious consequences for nurses, patients, and the health care system as a whole. This study sets the stage for further investigation on the human consequences of moral distress. Further, since moral reckoning impacts health, nurse leaders are challenged to identify opportunities to facilitate successful moral reckoning in the workplace through encouraging nurses to tell their stories, examine conflicts, and participate as partners in moral decision making.
Downloads
Article Details
The Grounded Theory Review is an open access journal, which means that all content is freely available without charge to the user or his/her institution. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles in this journal without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author. This is in accordance with the international Budapest Open Access Initiative (BOAI) definition of open access.
References
Anderson, S. L. (1990). Patient advocacy and whistle-blowing in nursing: Help for the helpers. Nursing Forum, 25(3), 5-13.
Beauchamp, T. L., &. Childress, J. F. (2001). Principles of biomedical ethics (5th ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.
Chinn, P. L. (Ed.). (1986). Nursing research methodology: Issues and implementation. Rockville, MD: Aspen.
Corley, M. C. (1995). Moral distress of critical care nurses. American Journal of Critical Care, 4(4), 280-285.
Davies, B., Clarke, D., Connaughty, S., Cook, K., MacKenzie, B., McCormick, J., O'Loane, M., & Stutzer, C. (1996). Caring for dying children: Nurses' experiences. Ped Nurs, 22, 500-507.
Fenton, M. (1988). Moral distress in clinical practice: Implications for the nurse administrator. Canadian Journal of Nursing Administration, 1(3), 8-11.
Glaser, B. G. (1978). Advances in the methodology of grounded theory: Theoretical sensitivity. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.
Glaser, B. G. (Ed.). (1996). Gerund grounded theory: The basic social process dissertation. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.
Glaser, B. G. (1998). Doing grounded theory: Issues and discussion. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.
Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. New York: Aldine De Gruyter.
Jameton, A. (1984). Nursing practice: The ethical issues.Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Kelly, B. (1998). Preserving moral integrity: A follow-up study with new graduate nurses. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 28, 1134-1145.
Krishnasamy, M. (1999). Nursing, morality, and emotions: Phase I and phase II clinical trials and patients with cancer. Cancer Nursing, 22, 251-259.
Millette, B. E. (1994). Using Gilligan’s framework to analyze nurses’ stories of moral choices. Western Journal of Nursing Research, 16, 660-674.
Nathaniel, A. K. (2003) Toward an understanding of moral distress. Unpublished Paper.
Penticuff, J. H.(1997). Nursing perspectives in bioethics. In Kazumasa Hoshino (Ed.). Japanese and Western Bioethics (pp. 49-60). The Netherlands: Khower Academic Publishers.
Perkin, R. M., Young, T., Freier, M. C., Allen, J., & Orr, R. D. (1997). Stress and distress in pediatric nurses: Lessons from Baby K. American Journal of Critical Care, 6, 225-232.
Redman, B., & Fry, S. T. (2000). Nurses’ ethical conflicts: What is really known about them? Nursing Ethics, 7, 360-366.
Simpson, J. A., &. Weiner, E. S. (Eds.). (1989). The Oxford English dictionary (2nd ed., Vols. 1-20). New York: Oxford University Press.
Soloman, M., O’Donnell, L., Jennings, B., Guilfoy, V., Wolf, S. M., Nolan, K., Jackson, R., Koch-Weser, D., & Donnelley, S. (1993). Decisions near the end of life: Professional views on life sustaining treatments. American Journal of Public Health, 83(1). 14-25.
Viney, C. (1996). A phenomenological study of ethical decision-making experiences among senior intensive care nurses and doctors concerning withdrawal of treatment. Nursing in Critical Care, 1, 182-187.
Wilkinson, J. M. (1987-88). Moral distress in nursing practice: Experience and effect. Nursing Forum, 23(1), 16-29.