Solutioning
Main Article Content
Abstract
The theory that is presented below aims to conceptualise how a group of undergraduate students tackle non-routine mathematical problems during a problem-solving course. The aim of the course is to allow students to experience mathematics as a creative process and to reflect on their own experience. During the course, students are required to produce a written ‘rubric’ of their work, i.e., to document their thoughts as they occur as well as their emotions during the process. These ‘rubrics’ were used as the main source of data. Students’ problem-solving processes can be explained as a three-stage process that has been called ‘solutioning’. This process is presented in the six sections below. The first three refer to a common area of concern that can be called ‘generating knowledge’. In this way, generating knowledge also includes issues related to ‘key ideas’ and ‘gaining understanding’. The third and the fourth sections refer to ‘generating’ and ‘validating a solution’, respectively. Finally, once solutions are generated and validated, students usually try to improve them further before presenting them as final results. Thus, the last section deals with ‘improving a solution’. Although not all students go through all of the stages, it may be said that ‘solutioning’ considers students’ main concerns as they tackle non-routine mathematical problems.
Downloads
Article Details
The Grounded Theory Review is an open access journal, which means that all content is freely available without charge to the user or his/her institution. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles in this journal without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author. This is in accordance with the international Budapest Open Access Initiative (BOAI) definition of open access.
References
Barnes, M. (2000). “Magical” Moments in Mathematics: Insights into the Process of Coming to Know. For the Learning of Mathematics, 20(1), 33-43.
Eizenberg, M. M., & Zaslavsky, O. (2003). Cooperative Problem Solving in Combinatorics: The Inter-Relations between Control Processes and Successful Solutions. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 22(4), 389-403.
Fischbein, E., & Grossman, A. (1997). Schemata and Intuitions in Combinatorial Reasoning. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 34(1), 27-47.
Inglis, M., & Simpson, A. (in press). Mathematicians and the Selection Task. Proceedings of the 28th International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, Bergen.
Mason, J. H., Burton, L., & Stacey, K. (1982). Thinking Mathematically.Avon: Addison-Wesley.
Raman, M. (2003). Key Ideas: What Are They and How Can They Help Us Understand How People View Proof? Educational Studies in Mathematics, 52(3), 319-325.
Simon, M. A. (1996). Beyond Inductive and Deductive Reasoning: The Search for a Sense of Knowing. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 30, 197-210.
Skemp, R. R. (1976). Relational Understanding and Instrumental Understanding. Mathematics Teaching, 77, 20-26.
Thurston, W. P. (1995). On Proof and Progress in Mathematics. For the Learning of Mathematics, 15(1), 29-37.