Staying Open The use of theoretical codes in grounded theory
Main Article Content
Abstract
Theoretical codes (TCs) are abstract models that emerge during the sorting and memoing stages of grounded theory (GT) analysis. They conceptualize the integration of substantive codes as hypotheses of a theory. In this article, I explore the importance of their emergence in the development of a grounded theory and I discuss the challenge of the researcher in staying open to their emergence and earned relevance rather than their preconceived forcing on the theory under development. I emphasize the importance of GT researchers developing theoretical sensitivity to a wide range of theoretical perspectives and their associated codes. It is a skill that all GT researchers can and should develop.
Downloads
Article Details
The Grounded Theory Review is an open access journal, which means that all content is freely available without charge to the user or his/her institution. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles in this journal without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author. This is in accordance with the international Budapest Open Access Initiative (BOAI) definition of open access.
References
Cutcliffe, J. R. (2000). Methodological issues in grounded theory. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 31(6), 1476-1484.
Dey, I. (1999). Grounding grounded theory: guidelines for qualitative inquiry. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Fernandez, W. D. (2003). Metateams in Major Information Technology Projects; a grounded theory on conflict, trust, communication and cost. Unpublished Doctor of Philosophy, Queensland University of Technology.
Gisburne, J. M. (2003). The applicability of the Misomodel to youth violence and the interpretations of dangerousness. Unpublished PhD, University of Nebraska, Lincoln, NB.
Glaser, B. G. (1964). Organizational Scientists: Their professional careers. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.
Glaser, B. G. (1978). Theoretical sensitivity: advances in the methodology of grounded theory. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.
Glaser, B. G. (1998). Doing grounded theory: Issues and discussions. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.
Glaser, B. G. (2002). Conceptualization: On theory and theorizing using grounded theory. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 1(2), Article 3.
Glaser, B. G. (2003). The grounded theory perspective II: Description's remodeling of grounded theory methodology. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.
Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1965). Awareness of Dying. Chicago: Aldine Publishing Company.
Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Hawthorne, NY: Aldine de Gruyter.
Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1971). Status Passage. Chicago: Aldine Atherton Inc.
Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1974). Time for Dying. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.
Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1975). Chronic Illness and the Quality of Life. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.
Lee, F. S. (2002). Theory creation and the methodological foundation of post Keynesian economics (Working Paper). Kansas City: Department of Economics, University of Missouri.
May, K. (1994). The case for magic in method. In J. Morse (Ed.), Critical issues in qualitative research methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Milliken, P. J., & Schreiber, R. S. (2001). Can you "do" grounded theory without symbolic interactionism? In R. S. Schreiber & P. N. Stern (Eds.), Using grounded theory in nursing
(pp. 177-190). New York: Springer.
Morse, J. (Ed.). (1994). Critical issues in qualitative research methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Ragin, C. C. (1987). The comparative method: Moving beyond qualitative and quantitative strategies: University of California Press.
Schreiber, R. S., & Stern, P. N. (Eds.). (2001). Using grounded theory in nursing. New York: Springer Publishing Company.
Skodol Wilson, H. (1977). Nursing Research, 26, 103.
Stern, P. N. (1980). Grounded Theory Methodology; its uses and processes. Image, 23.