Attraction, Autonomy, and Reciprocity in the Scientist Supervisor Relationship

Main Article Content

Barney G. Glaser

Abstract

This paper explores the basis of work integration between the scientist and his supervisor in an organization devoted to basic research.2 The analysis uses a three-dimensional model of role integration: 1) mutual attractiveness, why they get together; 2) reciprocity; and 3) autonomy, how they stabilize working together. The recognized competence in research of both parties is shown to be a source of mutual attraction, reciprocity in work and maintenance of autonomy.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Glaser, B. G. (2010). Attraction, Autonomy, and Reciprocity in the Scientist: Supervisor Relationship. Grounded Theory Review, 9(01), 1–20. Retrieved from https://groundedtheoryreview.org/index.php/gtr/article/view/59
Section
Articles

References

Blau, P.M. (1960). A Theory of Social Integration, American Journal of Sociology, 65, pp. 546-556.

Blau, P.M. & Scott, W.R. (1962). Formal Organizations: A Comparative Approach . San Francisco: Chandler Publishing.

Glaser, B.G. (1963). The local-cosmopolitan scientist. American Journal of Sociology . vol.69 (November), pp.249-259.

Glaser, B.G. (1963). Variations in the importance of recognition in scientists’ careers. Social Problems , vol.10 (Winter), pp.268-276.

Kornhauser, W. (1962). Scientist in Industry: Conflict and accommodation . Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

Lazarsfeld, P.F. & Rosenberg, M., Eds. (1955).The Language of Social Research . Glencoe, Ill.: Free Press.

Marcson,S. (1961). Organization and Authority in Industrial Research, Social Forces , 40 (1961), p.80.

Marcson, S. (1960). The Scientist in American Industry . New York: Harper

Merton, R.K. (1957). Priorities in Scientific Discovery, American Sociological Review, vol. 22, no. 6 (Dec), pp. 635-659.

Shepard, H.A. (1956). Superiors and Subordinates in Research, The Journal of Business , 29, p.266-267.