From the Editor's Desk Classic Grounded Theory: What it Is and What it Is Not

Main Article Content

Alvita Nathaniel

Abstract

Grounded theory is arguably the most frequently published qualitative research method. Yet it is often misunderstood. Many years ago, I gave a talk on the general tenets of classic grounded theory at a large regional research conference. After the presentation, a professor who taught PhD-level qualitative research at a large research university approached me asking: “Grounded theory doesn’t really need to result in a theory, does it? Can’t it consist of a list of themes?” In the same way that a pile of threads is not a shirt, a list of themes is not a theory. The purpose of this editorial is to clarify what grounded theory is and what it is not.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Nathaniel, A. (2021). From the Editor’s Desk: Classic Grounded Theory: What it Is and What it Is Not. Grounded Theory Review, 20(01), 1–7. Retrieved from https://groundedtheoryreview.org/index.php/gtr/article/view/342
Section
Articles

References

Glaser, B. G. (1978). Theoretical sensitivity: Advances in the methodology of grounded theory. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.

Glaser, B. G. (1992). Basics of grounded theory analysis. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.

Glaser, B. G. (1998). Doing grounded theory: Issues and discussion. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.

Glaser, B. G. (2002, rev. 2007). Constructivist grounded theory. Forum Qualitative Social Research, 3(3).

Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago, IL: Aldine Publishing.

Nathaniel, A. K., & Andrews, T. (2010). The modifiability of grounded theory. Grounded Theory Review, 9(1). Retrieved from http://groundedtheoryreview.com/2010/04/06/751/