Developing a Classic Grounded Theory Research Study Protocol A Primer for Doctoral Students and Novice Researchers
Main Article Content
Abstract
The research study protocol is a roadmap for conducting research systematically, efficiently, and ethically. While protocols have standard components, a classic grounded theory protocol differs in its methods, including processes and procedures, because of the uniqueness of the methodology. A classic grounded theory protocol commonly contains the following: (1) introduction to the topic; (2) purpose of the study with the research question; (3) detailed description of the research methods, including data collection and analysis; and (4) procedures to demonstrate the ethical conduct of human participant research. Based on a review of grounded theory methodological literature, the current article describes an approach for developing a research protocol that maintains grounded theory research integrity while adhering to institutional and funding requirements. A properly written study protocol is essential for maintaining methodological fidelity, avoiding method slurring, and unintended remodeling in classic grounded theory.
Downloads
Article Details
The Grounded Theory Review is an open access journal, which means that all content is freely available without charge to the user or his/her institution. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles in this journal without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author. This is in accordance with the international Budapest Open Access Initiative (BOAI) definition of open access.
References
Adashi, E. Y., Walters, L. B., & Menikoff, J. A. (2018). The Belmont Report at 40: Reckoning with time. American Journal of Public Health, 108(10), 1345-1348. https://doi.org/10.2105/ajph.2018.304580
Aldiabat, K. M., & Le Navenec, C. (2018). Data saturation: The mysterious step in grounded theory method. The Qualitative Report, 23(1), 245-261. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2018.2994
Allen, R. E. S., & Wiles, J. L. (2016). A rose by any other name: Participants choosing research pseudonyms. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 13(2), 149-165. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2015.1133746
Baker, C., Wuest, J., & Stern, P. N. (1992). Method slurring: The grounded theory/phenomenology example. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 17(11), 1355-1360. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.1992.tb01859.x
Bowen, G. A. (2008). Naturalistic inquiry and the saturation concept: A research note. Qualitative Research, 8, 137-152. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794107085301
Chametzky, B. (2022). Coding in classic grounded theory: I’ve done an interview; Now what? Grounded Theory Review, 21(2), 22-32. https://doi.org/10.4236/sm.2016.64014
Chametzky, B. (2023). Writing memos: A vital classic grounded theory task. European Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 3(1), 39-43. https://doi.org/10.24018/ejsocial.2023.3.1.377
Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. SAGE Publishing. https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/constructing-grounded-theory/book235960
Charmaz, K. (2014). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis (2 ed.). SAGE Publications.
Charmaz, K., & Belgrave, L. L. (2012). Qualitative interviewing and grounded theory analysis. In J. F. Gubrium, J. A. Holstein, & A. B. Marvasti (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of interview
research: The complexity of the craft (2 ed., pp. 347-366). SAGE Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452218403
Charmaz, K., & Thornberg, R. (2021). The pursuit of quality in grounded theory. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 18(3), 305-327. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2020.1780357
Chenitz, W. C., & Swanson, J. M. (1986). From practice to grounded theory: Qualitative research in nursing. Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.
Christiansen, O. (2011). The literature review in classic grounded theory studies: A methodological note. Grounded Theory Review, 10(3), 21-25. https://groundedtheoryreview.com/2011/12/20/the-literature-review-in-classic-grounded-theory-studies-a-methodological-note-2/
Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (Eds.). (2017). The SAGE handbook of qualitative research (5 ed.). SAGE Publishing. https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/the-sage-handbook-of-qualitative-research/book242504.
Dixon-Woods, M., Shaw, R. L., Agarwal, S., & Smith, J. A. (2004). The problem of appraising qualitative research. Quality and Safety in Health Care, 13(3), 223-225. https://doi.org/10.1136/qshc.2003.008714
Foley, G., & Timonen, V. (2015). Using grounded theory method to capture and analyze health care experiences. Health Services Research, 50(4), 1195-1210. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6773.12275
Foley, G., Timonen, V., Conlon, C., & O’Dare, C. E. (2021). Interviewing as a vehicle for theoretical sampling in grounded theory. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 20, 1609406920980957. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406920980957
Friese, S. (2012). Qualitative data analysis with ATLAS.ti. SAGE Publications.
Garside, R. (2014). Should we appraise the quality of qualitative research reports for systematic reviews, and if so, how? Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, 27(1), 67-79. https://doi.org/10.1080/13511610.2013.777270
Glaser, B. G. (1965). The constant comparative method of qualitative analysis. Social Problems, 12(4), 436-445. https://doi.org/10.2307/798843
Glaser, B. G. (1978). Theoretical sensitivity: Advances in the methodology of grounded theory. Sociology Press.
Glaser, B. G. (1992). Basics of grounded theory analysis: Emergence versus forcing. Sociology Press.
Glaser, B. G. (1998). Doing grounded theory: Issues and discussions. Sociology Press.
Glaser, B. G. (2001). The grounded theory perspective: Conceptualization contrasted with description. Sociology Press.
Glaser, B. G. (2002). Conceptualization: On theory and theorizing using grounded theory. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 1(2), 23-38. https://doi.org/10.1177/160940690200100203
Glaser, B. G. (2006). Generalizing: The descriptive struggle. Grounded Theory Review, 6(1), 1–28. https://groundedtheoryreview.com/2006/11/30/1330/
Glaser, B. G. (2008). The constant comparative method of qualitative analysis. 7(3). http://groundedtheoryreview.com/2008/11/29/the-constant-comparative-method-of-qu
alitative-analysis-1/
Glaser, B. G. (2012). No preconception: The dictum. The Grounded Theory Review, 11(2). http://groundedtheoryreview.com/2012/11/28/no-preconception-the-dictum/
Glaser, B. G. (2013a). No preconceptions: The grounded theory dictum. Sociology Press. https://www.sociologypress.com/books/classic_series/No_Preconceptions.htm
Glaser, B. G. (2013b). Staying open: The use of theoretical codes in GT. Grounded Theory Review, 12(1), 3-8. https://groundedtheoryreview.com/2013/06/22/staying-open-the-use-of-theoretical-codes-in-gt/
Glaser, B. G. (2014). Memoing: A vital grounded theory procedure. Sociology Press.
Glaser, B. G. (2016). Grounded descriptions: A no no. Grounded Theory Review, 15(2), 3-7. http://groundedtheoryreview.com/2016/12/19/grounded-description-no-no/
Glaser, B. G. (2021). Getting started. Grounded Theory Review, 20(1), 3-6. https://groundedtheoryreview.com/2021/06/21/getting-started-3/
Glaser, B. G., & Holton, J. (2004). Remodeling grounded theory. Qualitative Social Research Forum, 5(2). https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-5.2.607
Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Aldine Publishing Company.
Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (2012). Discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Aldine Transaction.
Green, J., & Thorogood, N. (2018). Qualitative methods for health research (4 ed.). SAGE Publishing. https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/qualitative-methods-for-health-research/book254905
Guest, G., Bunce, A., & Johnson, L. (2006). How many interviews are enough?: An experiment with data saturation and variability. Field Methods, 18(1), 59-82. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X05279903
Guthrie, W., & Lowe, A. (2011). Getting through the PhD process using GT: A superviser-researcher perspective. In V. B. Martin & A. Gynnild (Eds.), Grounded theory: The philosophy, method, and works of Barney Glaser (pp. 51-66). BrownWalker Press.
Hennink, M. M., Kaiser, B. N., & Marconi, V. C. (2017). Code saturation versus meaning saturation: How many interviews are enough? Qualitative Health Research, 27(4), 591-608. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732316665344
Holton, J. (2008). Grounded theory as a general research methodology. Grounded Theory Review, 7(2), 67-93.
https://groundedtheoryreview.com/2008/06/30/grounded-theory-as-a-general-research-methodology/
Holton, J. A. (2007). The coding process and its challenges. In A. Bryant & K. Charmaz (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of grounded theory (pp. 265-290). SAGE Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781848607941
Holton, J. A. (2010). The coding process and its challenges. Grounded Theory Review, 9(1), 21-40. https://groundedtheoryreview.com/2010/04/02/the-coding-process-and-its-challenges/
Holton, J. A., & Walsh, I. (2017). Classic grounded theory: Applications with qualitative and quantitative data. SAGE Publishing.
Klopper, H. (2008). The qualitative research proposal. 2008, 31(4), 11. https://doi.org/10.4102/curationis.v31i4.1062
Low, J. (2019). A pragmatic definition of the concept of theoretical saturation. Sociological Focus, 52(2), 131-139. https://doi.org/10.1080/00380237.2018.1544514
Lusk, S. L. (2004). Developing an outstanding grant application. Western Journal of Nursing Research, 26(3), 367-373. https://doi.org/10.1177/0193945903261843
Morse, J. M. (1994). On the Crest of a Wave? Qualitative Health Research, 4(2), 139-141. https://doi.org/10.1177/104973239400400201
Morse, J. M. (2015). "Data were saturated . . . ". Qualitative Health Research, 25(5), 587-588. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732315576699
Morse, J. M., Barrett, M., Mayan, M., Olson, K., & Spiers, J. (2002). Verification strategies for establishing reliability and validity in qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 1(2), 13-22. https://doi.org/10.1177/160940690200100202
Morse, J. M., Bowers, B. J., & Charmaz, K. (2009). Developing grounded theory: The second generation. Routledge. https://www.routledge.com/Developing-Grounded-Theory-The-Second-Generation-Revisited/Morse-Bowers-Charmaz-Clarke-Corbin-Porr-Stern/p/book/9781138049994
Nathaniel, A. K. (2006). Thoughts on the literature review and GT. Grounded Theory Review, 5(2/3), 35-41. https://groundedtheoryreview.com/2006/06/30/1416/
Nathaniel, A. K. (2008). Eliciting spill: A methodological note. Grounded Theory Review, 7(1), 61-65. https://groundedtheoryreview.com/2008/03/30/1063/
Nathaniel, A. K. (2022). When and how to use extant literature in classic grounded theory. Grounded Theory Review, 5(2), 35-41. https://groundedtheoryreview.com/2022/12/31/when-and-how-to-use-extant-literature-in-classic-grounded-theory/
National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research. (1979). The Belmont report: Ethical principles and guidelines for the protection of human subjects of research. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare. https://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/regulations-and-policy/belmont-report/read-the-belmont-report/index.html
Office for Human Research Protections. (2021, March 10). 45 CFR 46. https://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/regulations-and-policy/regulations/45-cfr-46/index.html
Pritchard, I. A. (2021). Framework for the ethical conduct of research: The ethical principles of the Belmont Report. In Handbook of research ethics in psychological science. (pp. 3-21).
American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/0000258-001
Riis, P. (2000). Perspectives on the fifth revision of the Declaration of Helsinki. JAMA, 284, 3045-3046. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.284.23.3045
Sandelowski, M., & Barroso, J. (2003). Writing the proposal for a qualitative research methodology project. Qualitative Health Research, 13(6), 781-820. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732303013006003
Sandelowski, M., Davis, D. H., & Harris, B. G. (1989). Artful design: Writing the proposal for research in the naturalist paradigm. Research in Nursing & Health, 12(2), 77-84. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.4770120204
Scott, K. W., & Howell, D. (2008). Clarifying analysis and interpretation in grounded theory: Using a conditional relationship guide and reflective coding matrix. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 7(2), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1177/160940690800700201
Shuster, E. (1997). Fifty years later: The significance of the Nuremberg Code. New England Journal of Medicine, 337(20), 1436-1440. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm199711133372006
Simmons, O. E. (2010). Is that a real theory or did you just make it up? Teaching classic grounded theory. The Grounded Theory Review, 9(2), 15-38. http://groundedtheoryreview.com/2010/06/25/is-that-a-real-theory-or-did-you-just-make-it-up-teaching-classic-grounded-theory/
Simmons, O. E. (2022). Experiencing grounded theory: A comprehensive guide to learning, doing, mentoring, teaching, and applying grounded theory. BrownWalker Press. http://www.brownwalker.com/book/159942634X
Strauss, A. L., & Corbin, J. M. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. SAGE Publications.
Vander Linden, K. L., & Palmieri, P. A. (2021). Criteria for assessing a classic grounded theory study: A brief methodological review with minimum reporting recommendations.
Grounded Theory Review, 20(2), 107-115. https://groundedtheoryreview.com/2022/02/14/criteria-for-assessing-a-classic-grounded-theory-study-a-brief-methodological-review-with-minimum-reporting-recommendations/
Wiles, R., Crow, G., Heath, S., & Charles, V. (2008). The management of confidentiality and anonymity in social research. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 11(5), 417-428. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645570701622231
Wilson, C. B. (2013). An updated Declaration of Helsinki will provide more protection. Nature Medicine, 19(6), 664-664. https://doi.org/10.1038/nm0613-664
Wimpenny, P., & Gass, J. (2000). Interviewing in phenomenology and grounded theory: Is there a difference? Journal of Advanced Nursing, 31(6), 1485-1492. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2648.2000.01431.x
Xie, S. L. (2009). Striking a balance between program requirements and GT principles: Writing a compromised GT proposal. Grounded Theory Review, 8(2), 35-47. https://groundedtheoryreview.com/2009/06/30/901/