Having a Great Number of Codes in Glaserian Classic Grounded Theory
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
In Glaserian classic grounded theory, there is an expectation that a researcher will have a great number of codes (and memos) during a study as data are analyzed. While having many descriptive ideas may be acceptable in other designs, during open coding, a researcher needs to be mindful of the types of codes that are used. Codes in Glaserian classic grounded theory need to be conceptual rather than descriptive, which allows the researcher to reduce the potentially excessive number of codes. In this methodological memo, the author will discuss, explain, and offer examples of descriptive versus conceptual coding.
Downloads
Article Details
The Grounded Theory Review is an open-access journal, which means that all content is freely available without charge to the user or his/her institution. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles in this journal without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author. This is in accordance with the international Budapest Open Access Initiative (BOAI) definition of open access.
References
Chametzky, B. (2025). From the editor’s desk: Description and classic grounded theory. Grounded Theory Review, 25(1), 1–6. https://groundedtheoryreview.org/index.php/gtr/article/view/493/431
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications, Inc.
Elo, S., & Kyngäs, H. (2008). The qualitative content analysis process. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 62(1), 107–115. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04569.x
Glaser, B. (1965). The constant comparative method of qualitative analysis. Social Problems, 12(4), 436-445.
Glaser, B. (1998). Doing grounded theory: Issues and discussions. Sociology Press.
Glaser, B. (2001). The grounded theory perspective: Conceptualization contrasted with description. Sociology Press.
Glaser, B. (2002). Conceptualization: On theory and theorizing using grounded theory. International Institute for Qualitative Methodology, 1(2), 23–38. http://doi.org/10.1.1.120.9345
Glaser, B. (2007). Doing formal grounded theory: A proposal. Sociology Press.
Glaser, B. (2009). Jargonizing: Using the grounded theory vocabulary. Sociology Press.
Glaser, B. (2013a). Introduction: Free style memoing. Grounded Theory Review, 12(2), 2–14. https://groundedtheoryreview.org/index.php/gtr/article/view/173
Glaser, B. (2013b). No preconceptions: The grounded theory dictum. Sociology Press.