Offsetting the Affective Filter
Main Article Content
Abstract
When forced to deal with a stressful, unfamiliar situation, how do people react? People are familiar, in a traditional setting, with sensory overload. But in an online environment, when learners are anxious, they exhibit different behaviors to help mediate their anxiety. Additionally, in an online environment, since visual clues are often lacking, how do these behaviors manifest themselves? People navigate stressful and/or unfamiliar situations by offsetting their affective filter.
Downloads
Article Details
The Grounded Theory Review is an open access journal, which means that all content is freely available without charge to the user or his/her institution. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles in this journal without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author. This is in accordance with the international Budapest Open Access Initiative (BOAI) definition of open access.
References
Chametzky, B. (2014). Andragogy and engagement in online learning: Tenets and solutions.Creative Education, 5(10), 813-821. Retrieved from http://www.scirp.org/journal/CE/
Chametzky, B. (2016). Contradictions in e-learning: The naturalness of unnaturally learning online. The Online Journal of Distance Education and e-Learning, 4(1), 15-27. Retrieved from http://www.tojdel.net
Cook, R. (2012). Restoring washed out bridges so elearners [sic] arrive at online course destinations successfully. Creative Education, 3(4), 557-564. Retrieved from http://www.scirp.org/journal/ce/
Glaser, B., & Strauss, A. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.
Glaser, B. (1965). The constant comparative method of qualitative analysis. Social Problems, 12(4), 436-445. Retrieved from http://ucpressjournals.com/journal.php?j=sp
Glaser, B. (1978). Theoretical sensitivity. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.
Glaser, B. (2002). Conceptualization: On theory and theorizing using grounded theory. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 1(2), 23-38. doi:10.1.1.120.9345
Iqbal, A., & Kokash, H. (2011). Faculty perception of stress and coping strategies in a Saudi private university: An exploratory study. International Education Studies, 4(3), 137-149. Retrieved from http://ccsenet.org/ies
Miller, G. (1956). The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychological Review, 63(2), 81-97.doi:10.1037/h0043158
Saba, F. (2011). Distance education in the United States: Past, present, future. Educational Technology. November-December 2011. pp. 11-18. Retrieved from http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.365.9558&rep=rep1&type=pdf
Thomas, C., Cassady, J., & Heller, M. (2017). The influence of emotional intelligence, cognitive test anxiety, and coping strategies on undergraduate academic performance. Learning and Individual Differences, 55, 40-48. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2017.03.001
Yalof, B., & Chametzky B. (2016). Mentoring online doctoral students through a community of practice model. The Online Journal of Distance Education and e-Learning, 4(2). Retrieved from http://www.tojdel.net/journals/tojdel/articles/v04i02/v04i02-05.pdf