Becoming an Expert: A Classic Grounded Theory Study of Doctoral Learners
Main Article Content
Abstract
The theory of Becoming an Expert is about the transformation from a student who consumes knowledge to expert and scholar-researcher who creates knowledge. However, more conceptually, the theory is equally applicable to anyone who progresses from novice to expert in a specific endeavor or field. The process may start with an innocuous idea as “I would like to learn more about ABC.” Through a series of trials and tribulations—referred broadly as juggling in the theory—the person gains necessary experience in this area. These needed trials and tribulations are what help the person transform to an expert. Without these troubling incidences, these people would not necessarily have the opportunities to reflect and grow. As proficiency and knowledge are gained, as the person reflects on tumultuous events, he or she transforms into an expert.
Downloads
Article Details
The Grounded Theory Review is an open-access journal, which means that all content is freely available without charge to the user or his/her institution. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles in this journal without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author. This is in accordance with the international Budapest Open Access Initiative (BOAI) definition of open access.
References
Ali, A., & Kohun, F. (2006). Dealing with isolation feelings in IS doctoral programs. International Journal of Doctoral Studies 1, 21–33. Retrieved from http://www.informingscience.us/icarus/journals/ijds/
Ames, C., Berman, R., & Casteel, A. (2018). A preliminary examination of doctoral student retention factors in private online workspaces. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 13, 79-107. Retrieved from http://informingscience.com/ijds/Volume13/IJDSv13p079-107Ames4060.pdf
Barney, K. (2018). Community gets you through: Success factors contributing to the retention of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander High Degree by Research (HDR) students. Student Success, 9(4), 13-23). doi:10.5204/ssj.v9i4.654
Breitenbach, E. (2019). Evaluating a model to increase doctorate program completion rates: A focus on social connectedness and structure. International Journal of Doctoral Students, 14, 217-236. doi:10.28945/4239. https://doi.org/10.28945/4239
Burkholder, D. (2012). Returning counselor education doctoral students: Issues of retention, attrition, and perceived experiences. The Journal of Counselor Preparation and Supervision, 4(2). http://dx.doi.org/10.7729/42.0027. Retrieved from https://repository.wcsu.edu/jcps/vol4/iss2/1/
Burton, L. (2016). Can a tomato increase your productivity? Journal of Research on Christian Education, 25(2), 95-96. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10656219.2016.1191926
Chametzky, B. (2013). Offsetting the affective filter: A classic grounded theory study of post-secondary online foreign language learners. [Doctoral dissertation, Northcentral
University]. PQDT Open. Retrieved from https://pqdtopen.proquest.com/doc/1373300841.html?FMT=ABS
Chametzky, B. (2018). Communication in online learning: Being meaningful and reducing isolation. In Scheg, A., & Shaw, M. (Eds.), Fostering Effective Student
Communication in Online Graduate Courses (pp. 20-41). IGI Global. Retrieved from https://www.igi-global.com/book/fostering-effective-student-communication-online/178181 doi:10.4018/978-1-5225-2682-7.ch002
Ewing, H., Mathieson, K., Alexander, J., & Leafman, J. (2012). Enhancing the acquisition of skills in online doctoral programs: The Ewing Model. MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 8(1), 34-44
Fetzner, M. (2013). What do unsuccessful online students want us to know? Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 17(1), 13-27. Retrieved from http://onlinelearningconsortium.org/publications/olj_main?page=1
Fleming, T. (2018). Critical theory and transformative learning: Rethinking the radical intent of Mezirow’s theory. International Journal of Adult Vocational Education and Technology, 9(3), 1-13). doi:10.4018/IJAVET.2018070101
Gardner, S. K. (2010). Contrasting the socialization experiences of doctoral students in high- and low-completing departments: A qualitative analysis of disciplinary contexts at one institution. The Journal of Higher Education, 81(1), 61-81.
Glaser, B. (1965). The constant comparative method of qualitative analysis. Social Problems, 12(4), 436-445. Retrieved from http://ucpressjournals.com/journal.php?j=sp
Glaser, B. (2009). Jargonizing: Using the grounded theory vocabulary. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.
Green, E. (2016). ‘Half the fun is getting there’: A beginner’s guide to doctoral study. Nurse Researcher, 23(6), 26-30. doi:10.7748/nr.2016.e1446.
Hlinka, K. (2017). Tailoring retention theories to meet the needs of rural Appalachian community college students. Community College Review, 45(2), 144-164. doi:10.1177/0091552116686403
Hutchins, H., & Rainbolt, H. (2017). What triggers imposter phenomenon among academic faculty? A critical incident study exploring antecedents, coping, and development opportunities. Human Resources Development International, 20(3), 194-214. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13678868.2016.1248205
Johnson, J., & Rulo, K. (2019). Problem in the profession: How and why writing skills in nursing must be improved. Journal of Professional Nursing, 35(1), 57-64). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.profnurs.2018.05.005. Retrieved from https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S8755722318300619
Katz, S. (2019). Applying transformative learning theory to open education essays. Journal of Transformative Learning, 6(2), 1-6. Retrieved from https://jotl.uco.edu/index.php/jotl/article/view/261
King, K. (2009). Handbook of the evolving research of transformative learning based on the Learning Activities Survey (10th anniversary edition). Charlotte, NC: IAP-Information Age Publishing
Kommers, S., & Pham, D. (2016). How Tinto’s theory differs for Asian and non-Asian international students: A quantitative study. Journal of International Students, 6(4), 999-1014. Retrieved from http://jistudents.org/
Leech, B. (2002). Asking questions: Techniques for semistructured interviews. PS: Political Science & Politics, 35(04), 665-668. doi:10.1017.S1049096502001129
Maher, M., Wofford, A., Roksa, J., & Feldon, D. (2017). Exploring early exists: Doctoral attrition in the biomedical sciences. Journal of College Student Retention: Research,Theory & Practice, 1-22. doi:10.1177/1521025117736871. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/profile/David_Feldon/publication/320738495_Exploring_Early_Exits_Doctoral_Attrition_in_the_Biomedical_Sciences/links/5acb94f9aca272 abdc636190/Exploring-Early-Exits-Doctoral-Attrition-in-the-Biomedical-Sciences.pdf
Marshall, S., Klocko, B., & Davidson, J. (2017). Dissertation completion: No longer higher education’s invisible problem. Journal of Educational Research and Practice, 7(1), 74-90. doi:10.5590/JERAP.2017.07.1.06
Maul, J., Berman, R., & Ames, C. (2018). Exploring the psychological benefits of using an emerging video technology to coach and retain doctoral learners. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 13, 49-78. https://doi.org/10.28945/3954
Maxham, L., Taylor, E., Dwyer, T., Lauder, W., Stephens, M., Antoniou, C., . . . & Fuller, C. (2016). Articulating expectations about supervision: Getting it right at the start of the journey. In M. Fourie-Malherbe, C. Aitchison, E. Blitzer, & R. Albertyn (Eds.), Postgraduate Supervision-Future Foci for the knowledge society. Stellenbocsh: SUN PRESS. doi:10.18820/9781928357223/08
Olive, J. (2019). The impact of longitudinal action research on doctoral student retention and degree completion. The Qualitative Report, 24(3), 470-482. Retrieved from https://nsuworks.nova.edu/tqr/vol24/iss3/3
Shaw, M., Chametzky, B., Burrus, S., & Walters, K. (2013). An evaluation of student outcomes by course duration in online higher education. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 16(4). Available from http://www.westga.edu/~distance/ojdla
Spradley, J. (1979). The ethnographic interview. NY: Holt, Rinehart and Winston. Retrieved from https://books.google.com/booksid=KZ3lCwAAQBAJ&printsec=frontcover&dq=spradley&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwj3uNr_2cLfAhUjp1kKHTtLBJAQ6AEIQzAE#v=onepage&q=spradley&f=false
Sutton, R. (2014). Unlearning the past: New foundations for online student retention. Journal of Educators Online, 11(3). Retrieved from http://www.thejeo.com/index.html
Sverdlik, A., Hall, N., McAlpine, L., & Hubbard, K. (2018). The PhD experience: A review of the factors influencing doctoral students’ completion, achievement, and well-being. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 13, 361-388. https://doi.org/10.28945/4113
Terrell, S., Snyder, M., Dringus, L., & Maddrey, E. (2012). A grounded theory of connectivity and persistence in a limited residency doctoral program. The Qualitative Report, 17(Article 62), 1-14. Retrieved from http://www.nova.edu/ssss/QR/QR17/terrell.pdf
Transformative learning. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://sites.google.com/site/transformativelearning/elements-of-the-theory-1
Transformative learning theory (Mezirow). Retrieved from https://www.learning-theories.com/transformative-learning-theory-mezirow.html
Willging, P. & Johnson, S. (2009). Factors that influence students’ decision to dropout [sic] of online courses. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 13(3), 115-127. Retrieved from http://onlinelearningconsortium.org/publications/olj_main
Yazdani, S., & Shokooh, F. (2018). Defining doctorateness: A concept analysis. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 13, 31-48. https://doi.org/10.28945/3939